Exploring Hinduism, Hinduism megathread

[RAMU KAKA]

I’ll take that as a win, not trynna simplify complex things here, answers would be long.

So basically a shit ton of mental/mathematical gymnastics to prove something that is disproven by single verse in your own book laughing my ass off at your stupidity jfl jfl make sure you dont break a nerve or a bone + if the source you quoted is true then your book is contradicting which means your Gods had weak memory ( i would advice eating some chawanprash)

 

[RAMU KAKA]

can this thread be moved to reddit?

Hindus will gather in majority and spam jay shree ram on my replies lol

 

[alpha]

View attachment 2108572

So basically a shit ton of mental/mathematical gymnastics to prove something that is disproven by single verse in your own book laughing my ass off at your stupidity jfl jfl make sure you dont break a nerve or a bone + if the source you quoted is true then your book is contradicting which means your Gods had weak memory ( i would advice eating some chawanprash)

Since vedic era, Upanayana or initiation of education was considered as 2nd birth (Dwija). For Brahmins it was done at age of 8, Kshatriyas at 11 and Vaishyas at 12. They were called Dwija (twice born) after that (Apasthamba Grihya Sutra). Since both Sita and Rama were from Kshatriya families, both of them were initiated at age of 11. So, after their 2nd birth (initiation), their new age was 6 and 13, but their biological age was 17 and 24 years respectively at time of marriage.

 

[alpha]

View attachment 2108572

So basically a shit ton of mental/mathematical gymnastics to prove something that is disproven by single verse in your own book laughing my ass off at your stupidity jfl jfl make sure you dont break a nerve or a bone + if the source you quoted is true then your book is contradicting which means your Gods had weak memory ( i would advice eating some chawanprash)

https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjH7q7A5db9AhV0UGwGHRlpD84QFnoECAwQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.booksfact.com%2Fpuranas%2Fmyth-child-marriages-ancient-india-real-age-rama-seetha.html&usg=AOvVaw2fLq7fgKymQin7H5HBgn8S

 

[RAMU KAKA]

you guys cover up shit well ngl, didnt your pandit know this? Jfl

Since vedic era, Upanayana or initiation of education was considered as 2nd birth (Dwija). For Brahmins it was done at age of 8, Kshatriyas at 11 and Vaishyas at 12. They were called Dwija (twice born) after that (Apasthamba Grihya Sutra). Since both Sita and Rama were from Kshatriya families, both of them were initiated at age of 11. So, after their 2nd birth (initiation), their new age was 6 and 13, but their biological age was 17 and 24 years respectively at time of marriage.
View attachment 2108573

 

[alpha]

you guys cover up shit well ngl, didnt your pandit know this? Jfl

tf is this? What did they know? Nigga ig you gon reply, reply properly, also reply to the 9yo shit(you can’t I know).

 

[alpha]

No, i dont + she already hit puberty at 9

You dont seem to refute the fact that ram married 6 year old sita?

yeah lmao, puberty at 9.
JFL

 

[RAMU KAKA]

yeah lmao, puberty at 9.
JFL

This should be enough for that jfl at you thinking i cant answer that + theres not a permanent age for hitting puberty lol dont you know, when a girl has periods shes hit puberty

 

[RAMU KAKA]

tf is this? What did they know? Nigga ig you gon reply, reply properly, also reply to the 9yo shit(you can’t I know).

I linked a pandit saying that sita was 6 lol did he not know? Dumb fuck

 

[RAMU KAKA]

Since vedic era, Upanayana or initiation of education was considered as 2nd birth (Dwija). For Brahmins it was done at age of 8, Kshatriyas at 11 and Vaishyas at 12. They were called Dwija (twice born) after that (Apasthamba Grihya Sutra). Since both Sita and Rama were from Kshatriya families, both of them were initiated at age of 11. So, after their 2nd birth (initiation), their new age was 6 and 13, but their biological age was 17 and 24 years respectively at time of marriage.
View attachment 2108573

Lets see, hmmmmm your books seem full of contradictions, is that enough proof that it isnt the word of God and some man made fairy tale?

 

[RAMU KAKA]

Since vedic era, Upanayana or initiation of education was considered as 2nd birth (Dwija). For Brahmins it was done at age of 8, Kshatriyas at 11 and Vaishyas at 12. They were called Dwija (twice born) after that (Apasthamba Grihya Sutra). Since both Sita and Rama were from Kshatriya families, both of them were initiated at age of 11. So, after their 2nd birth (initiation), their new age was 6 and 13, but their biological age was 17 and 24 years respectively at time of marriage.
View attachment 2108573

Some sources even say she was bigger than ram lol what do you have to say about that?

 

[RAMU KAKA]

yeah lmao, puberty at 9.
JFL

If we do a little math here we understand that Sita was 18 years old when she went into exile with her husband and before the exile she had spent 12 years with her husband in the hosue of King Dashratha, so if we deduct the age of Sita at the time of exile and number years she spent in the house of King Dasharath i.e., 12 years:

18 - 12 = 6 years old

Sita after marrying at 6, lived in the palace of King Dashrath until she was 12. When she was sent to exile with her husband, she was 18 years old. The age difference between Rama and Sita was 7 years. Skanda Purana clearly states that Sita was married when she was only six years old!

Source: Valmiki Ramayana, Aranya Kanda section 47

https://static.sirimangalo.org/pdf/aranyakandam.pdf

 

[alpha]

View attachment 2108587

This should be enough for that jfl at you thinking i cant answer that + theres not a permanent age for hitting puberty lol dont you know, when a girl has periods shes hit puberty

Yeah dude, even if we say that he fucked her after puberty, but she was still a 9 y/o, is that morally correct now?

If we do a little math here we understand that Sita was 18 years old when she went into exile with her husband and before the exile she had spent 12 years with her husband in the hosue of King Dashratha, so if we deduct the age of Sita at the time of exile and number years she spent in the house of King Dasharath i.e., 12 years:

18 - 12 = 6 years old

Sita after marrying at 6, lived in the palace of King Dashrath until she was 12. When she was sent to exile with her husband, she was 18 years old. The age difference between Rama and Sita was 7 years. Skanda Purana clearly states that Sita was married when she was only six years old!

Source: Valmiki Ramayana, Aranya Kanda section 47

https://static.sirimangalo.org/pdf/aranyakandam.pdf

So, after their 2nd birth (initiation), their new age was 6 and 13, but their biological age was 17 and 24 years respectively at time of marriage.

Yeah, you know maths, didn’t expect as you seem retarted.

View attachment 2108588

Lets see, hmmmmm your books seem full of contradictions, is that enough proof that it isnt the word of God and some man made fairy tale?

https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj0otfT7db9AhUi7TgGHcTyCDsQFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwikiislam.net%2Fwiki%2FContradictions_in_the_Quran&usg=AOvVaw3xoJavbpoVFl5UEd911p11

(By some islamic site btw.)
one more(but are librandus, lets see if you believe them now)-https://web.archive.org/web/20170719052545/http://www.1000mistakes.com/

View attachment 2108588

Lets see, hmmmmm your books seem full of contradictions, is that enough proof that it isnt the word of God and some man made fairy tale?

Again, this is not their biological age, counting from 2nd birth.

 

[forevermirin]

No, i dont + she already hit puberty at 9

nigga what

 

[alpha]

Any Normal person after reading quran-

nigga what

 

[GuyFromSingapore]