Height is important when it comes to dating. (Brutal if you're short)

D

Deleted member 51781

HTN is law
Joined
Nov 13, 2023
Posts
2,359
Reputation
2,937
1708894685307
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: hattrick, Deleted member 48689, med and 4 others
is this just a theory atm or has it been confirmed?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: smoth, socialcel, Deleted member 64064 and 2 others
this data is less brutal than what people here say about height
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Dystopian, RTLBbc, Deleted member 49130 and 8 others
  • JFL
Reactions: IAMNOTANINCEL
  • Woah
Reactions: IAMNOTANINCEL
in what world is 5’10 better than 6’2-6’3 must be an old study before zoomer bs. i think the most accurate is the one that had height peak at 6’3
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tallest person here, Dystopian, RTLBbc and 5 others
another BOTB worthy thread !
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: IAMNOTANINCEL and Deleted member 51781
According to data it is quite brutal to be below 6ft.
5'9 is survivable, 5'10 OK, 6'0 is ideal, and 6'5+ is failo-tier. It's very tame compared to what you read here.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 49130, Deleted member 51465, proxyy and 1 other person
water, also what years the data from? why simply post random graphs
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
5'9 is survivable, 5'10 OK, 6'0 is ideal, and 6'5+ is failo-tier. It's very tame compared to what you read here.
They altered the study a little, otherwise too many people would be put on suicide watch.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mewl
water, also what years the data from? why simply post random graphs
I thought that I'd share this blackpill data, to let people know that height matters.
 
water, also what years the data from? why simply post random graphs
dunno about these ones specifically, but their results are very similar to a study called "The Height of Choosiness", which is from 2013
1708895415378
 
Last edited:
I cant believe my eyes is this Fr?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend, Angutoid and IAMNOTANINCEL
how the fuck did they get 7 feet dudes, and how the fuck did they manage to get enough to constitute 17% of their results
Don't ask me. I just founds this on google images and found it post worthy.
 
Always believed 5 7 is a cutoff height, the potential partners grow a lot more from 5 7 to 5 8
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 49130, proxyy and Deleted member 51781
5'9 is survivable, 5'10 OK, 6'0 is ideal, and 6'5+ is failo-tier. It's very tame compared to what you read here.
5,8 at 14 im fucked
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
Always believed 5 7 is a cutoff height, the potential partners grow a lot more from 5 7 to 5 8
5'7 and 5'8 are both pretty bad heights to be. But I guess you've got a point.
 
Always believed 5 7 is a cutoff height, the potential partners grow a lot more from 5 7 to 5 8
The Height of Choosiness study has a part where they analyze which heights experience the biggest growth in dating pool size if 2 inches are added to them, and I think 5'5 had the biggest gain.
 
5'7 and 5'8 are both pretty bad heights to be. But I guess you've got a point.
5'5 / 5'4 are straight up dwarf. 5'6 /5'7 you are plain short. 5'8 - 5'9 ur kinda shorr but not really, 5'10 you are normal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 49130, Jasonfedele.is_god, Acridax and 1 other person
in what world is 5’10 better than 6’2-6’3 must be an old study before zoomer bs. i think the most accurate is the one that had height peak at 6’3
doesn't have to be an "old study", could just be an inaccurate one...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
  • +1
Reactions: RTLBbc, Deleted member 49130, kramer and 1 other person
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
The Height of Choosiness study has a part where they analyze which heights experience the biggest growth in dating pool size if 2 inches are added to them, and I think 5'5 had the biggest gain.
Like from 5’3 to 5’5 or 5’5 to 5’7?
 
5,5 manlet got mad
i’m 2 inches taller than u barefoot little boy and fraud 6 foot. and no height for ur subhuman face anyways
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: RTLBbc and Deleted member 51781
i’m 2 inches taller than u barefoot little boy and fraud 6 foot. and no height for ur subhuman face anyways
i mog your ugly ass face at 14 DUDE, with that ugly ass steep gonial angle
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
i mog your ugly ass face at 14 DUDE, with that ugly ass steep gonial angle
Self-explanatory that it's over for you, when you're on here at 14 lil bro.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: latincell95
Self-explanatory that it's over for you, when you're on here at 14 lil bro.
i mostly troll, but im not fully blackpilled, i take it with a grain of salt yk
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
I've never heard of this before
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
i mog your ugly ass face at 14 DUDE, with that ugly ass steep gonial angle
just fucking lol. sure bud go back to tiktok little boy. my gonial angle is 121.7 degrees which is ideal. literal smooth brain generation
 
  • +1
Reactions: RTLBbc
just fucking lol. sure bud go back to tiktok little boy. my gonial angle is 121.7 degrees which is ideal. literal smooth brain generation
thats crazy it looks on your pfp like 140 degrees
 
The women numbers are way inflated. There's no chance 50% of men would be willing to date a 6 foot women. That's taller than most of the men who said yes.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 49130 and Deleted member 51781
The women numbers are way inflated. There's no chance 50% of men would be willing to date a 6 foot women. That's taller than most of the men who said yes.
6ft in a woman is about ideal for me at least.
 
6ft in a woman is about ideal for me at least.
I've never met a man who has that opinion before. I'm pretty sure most men would say 5'10 is their limit.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 49130 and Deleted member 51781
so according to this study
6'4 has less options than 5'10
doesnt make sense
 
I've never met a man who has that opinion before. I'm pretty sure most men would say 5'10 is their limit.
Only ethnics (or low T whites) are into short women from my experience.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 49130 and Roge
dunno about these ones specifically, but their results are very similar to a study called "The Height of Choosiness", which is from 2013
View attachment 2767885
Statistics Are worthless If 5ft has anything More than 0%. Theyre virtue signaling. Not saying what They do in reality.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 51781
have you ever been with one before ? their big feet and hands is kinda a turn off
Been with one? Nah. Spoken with a couple, yeah. The most attractive girl I've ever interacted with was 6ft, perhaps even 6'1. Her face was fucking immaculate.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 49130

Similar threads

Funnyunenjoyer1
Replies
10
Views
365
Bonesbonesbonesbone
Bonesbonesbonesbone
Lux
Replies
20
Views
450
Bigbootylover45
B
Hamudimaxxer
Replies
20
Views
192
Eďo_
Eďo_
glaruz
Replies
4
Views
46
try2beme
try2beme

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top