"I saw a Stacy with a subhuman!"

[ascension]

I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

 

[ascension]

 

[Deleted member 14693]

You probably think the MTB in your avi is a stacy...

 

[ascension]

You probably think the MTB in your avi is a stacy...

 

[BongMog]

View attachment 2201887

@Chinacurry going crazy on the phone

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

View attachment 2201876
View attachment 2201877

 

[AspiringMogger]

I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

They just rate them in terms of how attracted they are to them not objectively smh.

 

[Deleted member 21735]

this forum rates my itis ugly lol

 

[gigaChadlet]

It depends on the location..like the best looking girls in your school are Stacie's, on average they can be 6.5 or 7/10 and where I live it's not a rare sight to see a 6/10 or 7/10 girl with a 4/10 cool personality guy..I don't know about the west and I'm not going believe blackpillers who says White Girls are Chad only until I see it with my eyes irl

 

[thecel]

They just rate them in terms of how attracted they are to them not objectively smh.

It’s close to objective if the average man finds them just as attractive as they find them attractive.

 

[Deleted member 23218]

I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

Im a pretty harsh rater tbnh if i sayit you shopuld believe me

 

[Zer0/∞]

This is Stacy

 

[AspiringMogger]

It’s close to objective if the average man finds them just as attractive as they find them attractive.

I don’t agree, most men are naturally attracted to neoteny and they have certain features that they value higher than others. I find this woman incredibly attractive

Whereas some other users would prefer something like this

It’s all preference and some retard would rate the former HTB because he like more robust builds.

 

[thecel]

I don’t agree, most men are naturally attracted to neoteny and they have certain features that they value higher than others. I find this woman incredibly attractive

View attachment 2202067

Whereas some other users would prefer something like this
View attachment 2202091
It’s all preference and some retard would rate the former HTB because he like more robust builds.

So the average man would find the above woman attractive to a degree between how attractive you find her and how attractive the robust-preferring retard finds her.

 

[thecel]

I don’t agree, most men are naturally attracted to neoteny and they have certain features that they value higher than others. I find this woman incredibly attractive

View attachment 2202067

Whereas some other users would prefer something like this
View attachment 2202091
It’s all preference and some retard would rate the former HTB because he like more robust builds.

It’s close to objective if the average man finds them just as attractive as they find them attractive.

All I’m saying here is that rating according to your personal tastes doesn’t mean your ratings are biased/skewed/unobjective, as long as your taste is conventional.

 

[Bushman]

I don’t agree, most men are naturally attracted to neoteny and they have certain features that they value higher than others. I find this woman incredibly attractive

View attachment 2202067

Whereas some other users would prefer something like this
View attachment 2202091
It’s all preference and some retard would rate the former HTB because he like more robust builds.

I like robust women. The one at the bottom is attractive

 

[AspiringMogger]

So the average man would find the above woman attractive to a degree between how attractive you find her and how attractive the robust-preferring retard finds her.

Yea looks past a certain point is all subjective. Same for men tbh.

Women put men into three boxes

Unattractive Invisible: Attractive: It’s really that simple. If you are her type you can ascend from invisible to attractive but you’ll never be able to go from unattractive to attractive. That’s the brutal reality.

looksmax.org

 

[AspiringMogger]

All I’m saying here is that rating according to your personal tastes doesn’t mean your ratings are biased/skewed/unobjective, as long as your taste is conventional.

Okay so for men, we measure their midface, chin to philtrum etc. but for women we go on whatever we feel? Nah be fr.

Plenty of women I find ugly I’d rate highly like this foid, because she is aesthetic.

 

[AspiringMogger]

I like robust women. The one at the bottom is attractive

It’s all personal taste

 

[thecel]

Yea looks past a certain point is all subjective. Same for men tbh.

Women put men into three boxes

Unattractive Invisible: Attractive: It’s really that simple. If you are her type you can ascend from invisible to attractive but you’ll never be able to go from unattractive to attractive. That’s the brutal reality.

looksmax.org

Attractiveness is always objective. Subjectiveness isn’t about the variance in opinions. Objective vs subjective is all about the source of truth.

Attractiveness to an individual is objective because person A finds person B attractive to a certain amount that is the truth.

Attractiveness to a population is objective, just obviously. Bob is more attractive than Joe on the population scale if we demonstrate that Bob evokes a greater reaction of attraction from other people than Joe does.

 

[Deleted member 23772]

foids shouldnt be rated by psl and bones tbh, that shit is more for men. Women are feminine, hence why feminine features are mire attractive rather than these trannymaxxed «stacies» alot of niggas would consider to call. I agree with @AspiringMogger

 

[thecel]

Okay so for men, we measure their midface, chin to philtrum etc. but for women we go on whatever we feel? Nah be fr.

Plenty of women I find ugly I’d rate highly like this foid, because she is aesthetic.

View attachment 2202115

We don’t rate men based on their measured ratios JFL. Maybe you do, but keep being a PSL fuck then.

 

[thecel]

foids shouldnt be rated by psl and bones tbh, that shit is more for men. Women are feminine, hence why feminine features are mire attractive rather than these trannymaxxed «stacies» alot of niggas would consider to call. I agree with @AspiringMogger

Just rate by look bro it’s that simple. The rationale behind some users choosing to rate by analysis is beyond me.

 

[St.TikTokcel]

Okay so for men, we measure their midface, chin to philtrum etc. but for women we go on whatever we feel? Nah be fr.

Plenty of women I find ugly I’d rate highly like this foid, because she is aesthetic.

View attachment 2202115

Stole my chin

 

[Michael Myers]

I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

Usually the Stacy is a MTB and the subhuman is MTN.

 

[ascension]

Usually the Stacy is a MTB and the subhuman is MTN.

Exactly. Users here underrate men and overrate women.

 

[thecel]

Exactly. Users here underrate men and overrate women.

or it’s a natural consequence of the fact that women are on average just better-looking than men are.

Why Female Ratings Are So Bad

Some people rate by the gender-relative average system. In this method of rating, men and women are rated in separate pools, and the male average (at prime age) and the female average (at prime age) are set to 5/10. The average rating of either gender must be 5/10, because it is assigned as the...

looksmax.org

 

[AspiringMogger]

We don’t rate men based on their measured ratios JFL. Maybe you do, but keep being a PSL fuck then.

What do you rate based on then?

 

[thecel]

What do you rate based on then?

My scale is like rating from –5 to +5, where the midpoint is neither repulsive nor attractive. The neutral point (5/10) doesn’t necessarily need to match the population mean. 5/10 happens to be the male average only by coincidence.

When rating other men to give them looksmaxing advice, I aim to estimate how the female population on average would perceive him. I do this through intuition and compensation. I rate a man “by feel”, but I make sure to compensate for the ways that my preferences deviate from the norm (so far I haven’t found any significant deviations when it comes to the male gender).

When rating other women, the purpose is to express how I personally feel about them, so I rate by my own preferences with zero consideration for matching the rating to the tastes of the male population. This leads to me “overrating” overweight women. It’s not truly overrating, because my ratings of women aren’t intended to represent the taste of the average man, and rather are intended to express the attraction that I feel.

 

[AspiringMogger]

My scale is like rating from –5 to +5, where the midpoint is neither repulsive nor attractive. The neutral point (5/10) doesn’t necessarily need to match the population mean. 5/10 happens to be the male average only by coincidence.

When rating other men to give them looksmaxing advice, I aim to estimate how the female population on average would perceive him. I do this through intuition and compensation. I rate a man “by feel”, but I make sure to compensate for the ways that my preferences deviate from the norm (so far I haven’t found any significant deviations when it comes to the male gender).

When rating other women, the purpose is to express how I personally feel about them, so I rate by my own preferences with zero consideration for matching the rating to the tastes of the male population. This leads to me “overrating” overweight women. It’s not truly overrating, because my ratings of women aren’t intended to represent the taste of the average man, and rather are intended to express the attraction that I feel.

seems legit. You offer rates in pm?

 

[thecel]

seems legit. You offer rates in pm?

yes

 

[Red Fox]

or it’s a natural consequence of the fact that women are on average just better-looking than men are.

Why Female Ratings Are So Bad

Some people rate by the gender-relative average system. In this method of rating, men and women are rated in separate pools, and the male average (at prime age) and the female average (at prime age) are set to 5/10. The average rating of either gender must be 5/10, because it is assigned as the...

looksmax.org

Just look at some of my threads in ratings. Different users rate different women differently

 

[thecel]

Just look at some of my threads in ratings. Different users rate different women differently

yes and that’s ok cus men usually rate women to express how they feel about their looks

 

[Red Fox]

yes

That was quick !

 

[OldRooster]

It took you 4 years to figure out that some posters on this site are idiots and/or trolls?

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

Okay so for men, we measure their midface, chin to philtrum etc. but for women we go on whatever we feel? Nah be fr.

Plenty of women I find ugly I’d rate highly like this foid, because she is aesthetic.

View attachment 2202115

that bitch only needs 2x lips to be omega fogger

 

[buflek]

stacy is a blonde 170-175cm girl with big tits and nice ass, most likely cheerleader and good education

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

Okay so for men, we measure their midface, chin to philtrum etc. but for women we go on whatever we feel? Nah be fr.

Plenty of women I find ugly I’d rate highly like this foid, because she is aesthetic.

View attachment 2202115

quick shop