Lowest PSL isnt 0 actually

D

Deleted member 57464

Social Planner
Joined
Jan 1, 2024
Posts
18,200
Reputation
20,059
negative psl is in fact a think. JFL at rating blackops2cel 2/10, he is more like -2/10. jsanza was like a 0/10 and im a 2/10. People here rate too generously im afraid.

When you are invisible to women you cannot possibly be anything near a psl 5. Dating starts at like 4psl actually thats why you see non male model guys with girls and even they probably looked better when young cause you know, people descend over time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: slayer69 and goldpill
No wtf?

Jsanza is a solid 2 psl maybe 1.5 psl
Blackops2cel Is 1 PSL especially in his worst pics
0 PSL Is Codywinters327 and onecooldude123.

That’s because 0 PSL isn’t 0/10 on a normal scale it’s like 0.5-1/10


Actual 0/10s are burn victims, deformed people, etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: TechnoBoss, RiceCel1234 and Mr. Nobody
STOP changing the scale its fine as it is
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: RiceCel1234, Mr. Nobody, lemonnz and 3 others
B-b-but blackops2cel has positive canthal tilt! That's automatically 5!
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 57464
  • JFL
Reactions: wsada
STOP changing the scale its fine as it is
This isn't actually a change of scale. People cap it at 0 and 8 because there aren't many people below and above those bounds. It's defined as a normal distribution with a mean of 4 and S.D. of 1 so you can see how many people would fall in each PSL range. You'd expect about 0.003% of people to have a PSL below 0. Which would be about 250k people worldwide.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ElTruecel and Deleted member 57464
This isn't actually a change of scale. People cap it at 0 and 8 because there aren't many people below and above those bounds. It's defined as a normal distribution with a mean of 4 and S.D. of 1 so you can see how many people would fall in each PSL range. You'd expect about 0.003% of people to have a PSL below 0. Which would be about 250k people worldwide.
The ranges are this
This article idk maybe it’s a little off and I should’ve honestly edited to go by .5s instead of ranges. Because most people fail to understand it’s by ranges so they think I’m saying someone like Taylor Lautner is 5 PSL flat like Neymar but he isn’t. Lautner is 5.5 PSL and some could even argue 6 PSL.

But like I should’ve put 7 PSL as more like 0.0001% and 3 PSL may drop to 25% idk. Like 3 - 3.5 PSL is probably the most insignificant difference out of all the ratings .5s so like

I should just say 3 PSL = 25% maybe and 3.5 PSL = 30% maybe 35% idfk. It’s just a LTN who soft maxxed a little for 1 day ig.

@greycel
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
PSL is out of 10 u idiots, op is correct

0/10 to 10/10
 

Similar threads

D
Whitepill FUCK PSL
Replies
32
Views
919
MoggsWithBoness
MoggsWithBoness
King Solomon
Replies
173
Views
1K
LowInhibMaxxer1488
L
AromaOfLucifer
Replies
23
Views
1K
UZB_Strebl
UZB_Strebl
ShawarmaFilth
Replies
33
Views
872
pablomaxx
pablomaxx
spdxer
Replies
46
Views
2K
lwlaiet060920
lwlaiet060920

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top