What if dick size had a 1:1 inverse correlation with height?

ihatereddit

ihatereddit

Kraken
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Posts
7,380
Reputation
12,134
meaning manlets would all be dickmoggers while tall guys are dicklets
would this make the world more fair? would manlets see more action?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: hattrick, Iasacrko, Gonthar and 2 others
No, it would be unfair towards tallfags
 
head over to incels.is for me bud
 
  • +1
Reactions: rhinoplasty
average org theologian
 
Its already like that i got dick mogged by my manlet friend :feelswhy:
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: TechnoBoss
Yeah but height (only) is not a good predictor of dick size anyways
1712509056770
1712509361602
(((
1712510712031
)))

1712509539224


A 0.2 correlation coefficient translates to the average tall guy having like 1cm more than the average average (height) guy
To put things into perspective, pubic fat has a bigger impact than height in general
The sum of dimorphic traits are the best predictor, although I don't think there are studies that combine all of them
So height + index finger ratio + hip to shoulder ratio + arm length to height ratio etcc (basically a chad) you could possibly have a coefficient of like 0,5 or more

Nevertheless penis size is cope if you are average
1712511229438
 
  • +1
Reactions: TechnoBoss
meaning manlets would all be dickmoggers while tall guys are dicklets
would this make the world more fair? would manlets see more action?
It would actually Jfl that would be amazing since manlets would have higher smv

Girls would sacrifice sexual attraction for an overall better sex experience
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sub5c3l

Similar threads

forevergymcelling
Replies
54
Views
1K
Patient A
Patient A
Achilles
Replies
27
Views
684
risque_dew
R
MoggerGaston
Replies
43
Views
454
Primalsplit
Primalsplit
BrahminBoss
Replies
7
Views
226
6ft4
6ft4
BWC_virgin
Replies
15
Views
434
BWC_virgin
BWC_virgin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top