synock21
DM open for personal advice
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2023
- Posts
- 1,652
- Reputation
- 1,568
- OP
- #51
i am in the west, but rather the academic circleMy post revolves around western countries only
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
i am in the west, but rather the academic circleMy post revolves around western countries only
I am in the academic circle too. With first author nature papers etc. The same high quality girls you think are not interested in short term scenarios have done it in the past, wised up now and don’t wanna do it again.i am in the west, but rather the academic circle
oh well. Stale pussy> no pussyI am in the academic circle too. With first author nature papers etc. The same high quality girls you think are not interested in short term scenarios have done it in the past, wised up now and don’t wanna do it again.
Agreed.Not sure about 4/10 unless the guy is tall in addition and then has all those other traits to couple.
Remember women can get these personality traits in better looking men than 4s. The market has now been globalised with dating apps. They can search and search. I would have agreed with you pre 2016. Tinder came out in 2013 and it took about 3 years for it to go mainstream and shit to hit the fan with hypergamy.
In summary I agree those personality traits will assist, but if you are a 4 and not tall, I don't think they will assist for getting a girl that's a 5. You might get a 4 with trauma.
Ok.
You are "ugly", "recessed", and some basement dweller on here rated you a subhuman.
Now What?
Do you stop living life because some guy called you ugly?
Do you stop going out because you think foids will automatically hate you?
Do you stop working because "there is no point"?
Do you ultimately commit because "there is no point in living?"
Let Me introduce you to the MAROON PILL (haha Red+ Black = Maroon)
The black pill IS fundamentally true. If you are ugly, you are going to have less people attracted to you.
I am not denying that.
But everyday, I get more and more redpilled.
In college, Jestermaxxed MTNs are pulling HTBs.
Nerdy guys this forum would bully are pulling MTBs.
Confidencemaxxed LTNS are getting good rec letters for grad programs.
Confidencemaxxed LTNS are getting INTO those grad programs.
Are they ugly? Yes! .Org would call them recessed, even tell them to reincarnate.
Are they short? Yes! Many are below 5'6
Are they pulling MTBs and HTBs? Yes!
How? They are jestermaxxed, "charismatic", and Confident.
Would they slay more if they were MTNs? Yes of course! Do they care? no.
Status helps them, and increases their SMV.
Remember those "ugly" , subhuman "dalits" i told you about in college?
They just got into the best gradschool program in the country, and have a job
offer at Google.
Not Google? Its ok Microsoft wants them. Or Lockheed. Or IBM.
Do they slay pussy left and right? No. But they are happy in a LTR with a MTB or a HTB.
(before "MUH CHAD, BBC TAX PAID", most of the people in LTR were virgins before they
got together)
All because they worked hard, and have good status.
Moral of the story : If you are ugly, you HAVE to statusmaxx, become rich, etc. to slay.
if you are young, instamaxx. (already a good guide on that)
if you are older, slavemaxx. (go to college, get good job)
if you have tons of money, make more(start a business)
Example of Statusmaxxed incel pulling women you cant even imagine about :
Exhibit 1
THE WEEKND
View attachment 2675346
A MTN at best, pulling women like Selena Gomez, Bella hadid, Rosalia
Is he an outlier? Yes!
Am i saying everyone can be like him? No!
Am I saying you can be like him? No!
But what would he be doing if he wasn't statusmaxxed? flipping burgers.
Can you atleast try to be like him? YES
Its only over when you stop improving
is a 3/10 really 5 percentile? a 3 out of 10 should be approx 25 percentileAgreed.
When he says 99% of men can get "success", I'd disagree with the percentage alone, however to include all 99% implies that a 3/10 can have a relationship. For an individual in the 1-5th percentile physically, being completely and utterly in love with somebody who is not satisfied in you is far more likely,
And in a long term dating context, this is the complete opposite of success.
They a crumbs worth of box, and they get toyed with in exchange for it. That's not success.
I don't even think I'm nearly ugly enough to deal with this, this isn't a resentful personal perspective, it's what we all know deep down.
take the gypsypill
She looks like a pigeontake the gypsypill
No I agreeis a 3/10 really 5 percentile? a 3 out of 10 should be approx 25 percentile
No way a true 4/10 can get a successful LTR with a girl above LTB. Unless he is a fat fuck who has the genetic potential to be average looking+ and girls can see the potential in him.Not sure about 4/10 unless the guy is tall in addition and then has all those other traits to couple.
Remember women can get these personality traits in better looking men than 4s. The market has now been globalised with dating apps. They can search and search. I would have agreed with you pre 2016. Tinder came out in 2013 and it took about 3 years for it to go mainstream and shit to hit the fan with hypergamy.
In summary I agree those personality traits will assist, but if you are a 4 and not tall, I don't think they will assist for getting a girl that's a 5. You might get a 4 with trauma.
the weeknd the 5'8just be 6'4 theory bro
YesOk.
You are "ugly", "recessed", and some basement dweller on here rated you a subhuman.
Now What?
Do you stop living life because some guy called you ugly?
Do you stop going out because you think foids will automatically hate you?
Do you stop working because "there is no point"?
Do you ultimately commit because "there is no point in living?"
I said for the 95-99% of men, slaying fantasies and 100+ body counts is a pipe dream as they lack the raw genetic material (and they find that out pretty quickly from the market feedback).No I agree
Sorry bad writing the second example was on its own, shouldve made them proportional
I mean 1/10 - 3/10, the point remains.
Their capacity to have a real loving long term relationship is severly impaired. Could you spend your life with a girl you barely found to be passable. And if you did, would you enjoy it, would you be loving, would you grow resentment?
This is what I mean. Saying 99% of men can have success in long term dating implies a women can love and be happily married to an utter subhuman.
@DrTony you said 99-95%
99% doesn't mean 1/10's.
It means you're including 0.1/10's
you think that 0.1-0.5's can have long term success.
What does that even look like? A 0.1/10? The elephant man?
Fucking Fantasy Land Bruther
Well here what you actually saidI said for the 95-99% of men, slaying fantasies and 100+ body counts is a pipe dream
You didn't say they couldn't slay, you said they could succeedMost men (95-99%) have a chance to succeed in the less competitive long-term dating market.
Once again, this huge cohort of men, includes elephant man tier individuals, as you said 95-99%, which includes the 1st percentile, 1st percentile being 0.1/10So this huge cohort of men, should strive to secure a LTR by making themselves attractive prospects for long term potential for girls that got their Chad phase out of their system.
I have no problem with female nature, as I said, I'd do the exact same thing in their shoes. I wouldn't spend my life with somebody I don't find attractive, and I wouldn't expect them to, and as I said:These include developing a dependable personality, good career, willingness to selflessly provide, charismatic, funny , easy going etc. with enough luck and just average looks, these men can have a fighting chance in the* long term dating market*. Leave the bitterness aside, see reality and fight for it. Or stay perpetually single and bitter blaming “female nature.
Our disagreement is very simple. You saying 99% of men can find a fulfilling long term relationship implies people like the elephant man can find love.I don't even think I'm nearly ugly enough to deal with this, this isn't a resentful personal perspective.
Got it. Agreed with you. There is threshold for of attractiveness for the long-term dating market and ofc course only a subset of men will be qualified for this as well. Definitely not 95-99%. So you are right, I didn’t explain myself properly.Well here what you actually said
You didn't say they couldn't slay, you said they could succeed
Once again, this huge cohort of men, includes elephant man tier individuals, as you said 95-99%, which includes the 1st percentile, 1st percentile being 0.1/10
I have no problem with female nature, as I said, I'd do the exact same thing in their shoes. I wouldn't spend my life with somebody I don't find attractive, and I wouldn't expect them to, and as I said:
Our disagreement is very simple. You saying 99% of men can find a fulfilling long term relationship implies people like the elephant man can find love.
99% was an unreasonable number, that's all dude, you're making this an incel thing not me.
Just adjust the digits and we are in harmony my friend
high iq people go from bluepill to red pill and finally blackpillOk.
You are "ugly", "recessed", and some basement dweller on here rated you a subhuman.
Now What?
Do you stop living life because some guy called you ugly?
Do you stop going out because you think foids will automatically hate you?
Do you stop working because "there is no point"?
Do you ultimately commit because "there is no point in living?"
Let Me introduce you to the MAROON PILL (haha Red+ Black = Maroon)
The black pill IS fundamentally true. If you are ugly, you are going to have less people attracted to you.
I am not denying that.
But everyday, I get more and more redpilled.
In college, Jestermaxxed MTNs are pulling HTBs.
Nerdy guys this forum would bully are pulling MTBs.
Confidencemaxxed LTNS are getting good rec letters for grad programs.
Confidencemaxxed LTNS are getting INTO those grad programs.
Are they ugly? Yes! .Org would call them recessed, even tell them to reincarnate.
Are they short? Yes! Many are below 5'6
Are they pulling MTBs and HTBs? Yes!
How? They are jestermaxxed, "charismatic", and Confident.
Would they slay more if they were MTNs? Yes of course! Do they care? no.
Status helps them, and increases their SMV.
Remember those "ugly" , subhuman "dalits" i told you about in college?
They just got into the best gradschool program in the country, and have a job
offer at Google.
Not Google? Its ok Microsoft wants them. Or Lockheed. Or IBM.
Do they slay pussy left and right? No. But they are happy in a LTR with a MTB or a HTB.
(before "MUH CHAD, BBC TAX PAID", most of the people in LTR were virgins before they
got together)
All because they worked hard, and have good status.
Moral of the story : If you are ugly, you HAVE to statusmaxx, become rich, etc. to slay.
if you are young, instamaxx. (already a good guide on that)
if you are older, slavemaxx. (go to college, get good job)
if you have tons of money, make more(start a business)
Example of Statusmaxxed incel pulling women you cant even imagine about :
Exhibit 1
THE WEEKND
View attachment 2675346
A MTN at best, pulling women like Selena Gomez, Bella hadid, Rosalia
Is he an outlier? Yes!
Am i saying everyone can be like him? No!
Am I saying you can be like him? No!
But what would he be doing if he wasn't statusmaxxed? flipping burgers.
Can you atleast try to be like him? YES
Its only over when you stop improving
He is MTNYou're right, I agree
There is no way the weekend is Mtn.
He is mid tier subhuman at best
imo mtn on this forum is 65 percentile irlHe is MTN
MTN on this forum is either a Chadlite IRL or a 3/10 IRL, very rarely an actual MTN
Yeah either that or 35thimo mtn on this forum is 65 percentile irl
really? ratings is usually rlly consistent with itYeah either that or 35th