john2
Gyneolatry Fiend
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2019
- Posts
- 18,188
- Reputation
- 30,749
1 woman (the mother) and 1 man (the father) come together and should produce a maximum of only 2 children, meaning that when the mother and father die, they’ll be replaced by their two children. This ensures the population doesn’t increase or decrease (the world population should actually decrease now, in 2024).
If I was the prime minister of my country, here are the rules I will lay out for women if they’re going to have children -
If the third child born from a woman is a male, then he should be aborted. Women must outnumber men in any ideal society. I used to cope before by thinking women would still be chad-only and they’ll flock to the best looking man they can find even if the amount of men in society was low… while it’s true that women are chad-only, not all women get to settle with chads. A lot of women manage to settle with high-tier-normie men. I believe that if there are less men and more women in any society, then the rates of male inceldom will actually decline.
If females outnumbered men, then by logic, there will be less simps after each woman. Instead of women being simped by 1000 guys, women will be simped by 10 guys at best. This will reduce the competition for each man when it comes to finding a woman for himself.
In my opinion, the ratio of men to women should be 4:5. If there are 50 women, then there should be only 40 men.
To sum up -
I want good replies in this thread speaking about this idea of women outnumbering men. Thanks for reading this thread.
If I was the prime minister of my country, here are the rules I will lay out for women if they’re going to have children -
- Don’t have more than two children. If either of them or both of the children are deformed or ridden with a chronic disease/disability, then the deformed children will be allowed to seek euthanasia.
- Women can have more than two children only if the third child is a girl. Yes, in the title of this thread I did say women shouldn’t have more than two children, but if the third child born from any woman is a healthy normal female, then she should be allowed to live.
If the third child born from a woman is a male, then he should be aborted. Women must outnumber men in any ideal society. I used to cope before by thinking women would still be chad-only and they’ll flock to the best looking man they can find even if the amount of men in society was low… while it’s true that women are chad-only, not all women get to settle with chads. A lot of women manage to settle with high-tier-normie men. I believe that if there are less men and more women in any society, then the rates of male inceldom will actually decline.
If females outnumbered men, then by logic, there will be less simps after each woman. Instead of women being simped by 1000 guys, women will be simped by 10 guys at best. This will reduce the competition for each man when it comes to finding a woman for himself.
In my opinion, the ratio of men to women should be 4:5. If there are 50 women, then there should be only 40 men.
To sum up -
- Any woman in society can’t have more than three living children in her life.
- A woman can’t have more than two living sons.
- If a woman has three daughters, she can’t have any sons.
- If a woman has one son and one daughter, she is permitted to have an extra child, but that extra child needs to be a female.
- A male child can’t have more than two blood-sisters (born from his own biological mother).
- A male child can’t have more than one male-sibling/blood-brother (born from his own biological mother).
- A female sibling can have two brothers, but then she has to be the youngest among her brothers.
- A male child can have two more siblings at most, but not both of them will be males, one of the siblings born from his own biological mother needs to be a female.
I want good replies in this thread speaking about this idea of women outnumbering men. Thanks for reading this thread.
Last edited: