FWHR above 1.95 looks comical

[GetThatBread]

@GetThatBread

 

[MaxillaIsEverything]

its over for beta low fwhr faggots

 

[Deleted member 685]

View attachment 344097
its over for beta low fwhr faggots

Although I agree 1.80-2.0 is the ideal, you realize they measured that fucking shit right? Like absolutely dog shit

 

[Vidyacoper]

View attachment 344090

Chico fwhr is in 1.82-1.86 range in non disorted pictures.
On disorted pictures his fwhr varies from 1.65 to 2.10

cope pic i sent isnt distorted at all literally taken from a distance with a professional camera

@Vidyacoper got angry for no reason and started calling me a noob etc herassing his black brother when all I said was I believe a FWHR above 2 is unideal and usually correlates with brachycephaly

BRO
noob wasnt meant as an insult, didnt see this post before otherwise i would have cleared it up lol
i play roblox alot and i type noob jokingly, its just a joke lol

You fucked with a black brother, I"m done with you now

sorry lol, said noob as a joke and dont take anything else i said personally

Also no Jordan isn't appealing to most women, even my sister laughed at how wide is with her friends when she found his pic in our older chats. He lacks generic looks, his face is too fat/wide and he's blonde

yeah current jordan looks like shit, prime jordan is unmoggable though (or would be if chico wasnt born)

It's still just barely 2, congratz on predicting someones FWHR better than me I guess, I'm sure you'll find a job with it faster

its 1.9-2.1 doesnt really matter much lol, lets just end this discussion or agree to disagree or w/e

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

View attachment 344097
its over for beta low fwhr faggots

Viewing This Thread (Looksmaxers: 95, Bluepilled: 49)

 

[GarixTheChad]

What is this app

 

[Mr.cope]

View attachment 344050

Meeks FWHR is 2.0 and it looks even a bit to high

In my opinion 1.85-1.95 is ideal
1.75-1.85 is normie / okayish
Below 1.75 its over


His midface ratio is also above ideal ( 1.0-1.1) at about 1.18

View attachment 344065

1.1 and over is compact 1 is ideal

 

[Deleted member 3043]

@Vidyacoper got angry for no reason and started calling me a noob etc herassing his black brother when all I said was I believe a FWHR above 2 is unideal and usually correlates with brachycephaly

true mine is really high and i look like a cube

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

1.1 and over is compact 1 is ideal

1.06 is ideal

 

[needsolution]

cope pic i sent isnt distorted at all literally taken from a distance with a professional camera

sorry bro im big fan of Chico, he is literal perfection, unmoggable but you are coping here
Chico's bizygomatic is literally 140mm, considering his midface lenght (pupil-upper lip) is 65mm he must have 5mm distance between eyes and eyebrow which is impossible (cuz its basically Ian Somerhalder brow setting tier).
Chico in most pictures (with family, friends) have 1.65-1.78 fwhr (obviously a bit disorted)
In professional shots he has 1.82-1.86 fwhr

Here example of 1.65 fwhr pic:

Here example of 1.78-1.8 pic:

And here the most accurate picture where his fwhr is 1.86:

Here shot with family members:

You can see that Chico's fwhr is around 1.85 range.

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

When the coping is....
View attachment 344093

What 2.8 fwhr mogger

 

[Deleted member 5187]

This shit is fucking low IQ

An fucking ant would have more common sense

Brb gonna measure mine
Already know I'm fucking golden
Don't tell me the optimal ratio till I have posted my stats

Okay mine is ~1.96-1.98 measured like pics posted here (top lip to eyebrow and from zygo to zygo??)
Measured multiple pics
Won't read all the comments to find optimal ratio

Someone tell me if this is good or rope worthy

According to title I look comical

 

[Nosecel]

Jfl what is the point of this dumb debate?
You guys better make threads about surgeries to increase fwhr

 

[robtical]

It should be from midbrow to under nose not above lips. Ideal in my opinion is jordan barrett or this guy

 

[MaxillaIsEverything]

sorry bro im big fan of Chico, he is literal perfection, unmoggable but you are coping here
Chico's bizygomatic is literally 140mm, considering his midface lenght (pupil-upper lip) is 65mm he must have 5mm distance between eyes and eyebrow which is impossible (cuz its basically Ian Somerhalder brow setting tier).
Chico in most pictures (with family, friends) have 1.65-1.78 fwhr (obviously a bit disorted)
In professional shots he has 1.82-1.86 fwhr

Here example of 1.65 fwhr pic:
View attachment 344111
Here example of 1.78-1.8 pic:
View attachment 344112
And here the most accurate picture where his fwhr is 1.86:
View attachment 344113

Here shot with family members:
View attachment 344114

You can see that Chico's fwhr is around 1.85 range.

see how he looks subhuman with the 1.65 ratio and good with 1.85. fwhr is everything

 

[Vidyacoper]

Here example of 1.65 fwhr pic:

visibly distorted

Here example of 1.78-1.8 pic:

Gyazo Screen Video

gyazo.com

its not 1.78 its 1.936 jfl

in the picture i sent where he's furthest away from camera his fwhr was 2.05-2.01
why are you coping needsolution? is it because you yourself have a low fwhr?

 

[Deleted member 2748]

Exactly, @Vidyacoper just chose a pic with lens distortion.

Harry Goodwins has the same, looks like a horse in some pics and then compact af in others

i feel like It should be common knowledge that lens distortion works both ways
if you take a picture from far enough your face is actually look wider than It is
which is why measuring people's fwhr from photos is so inaccurate

btw is It just me or does meeks' midface appear longish in newer photos ?

 

[Deleted member 5187]

So whats the ideal range?
Measured my face like an aspie again

 

[MaxillaIsEverything]

IF YOUR FWHR IS BELOW 1.8 YOU ARE A FUCKING BETA UGLY ASS SUBHUMAN END OF DISCUSSION.

 

[needsolution]

visibly distorted

Gyazo Screen Video

gyazo.com

its not 1.78 its 1.936 jfl

in the picture i sent where he's furthest away from camera his fwhr was 2.05-2.01
why are you coping needsolution? is it because you yourself have a low fwhr?

sad to see you behaving like others copers and frauding measurments etc

u didnt measure properly, i marked parts u missed

sad to see you behaving like that

 

[Vidyacoper]

sad to see you behaving like others copers and frauding measurments etc

View attachment 344121
u didnt measure properly, i marked parts u missed

sad to see you behaving like that

i cant tell if ur kidding or not right now LOL

i measured it precisely on top of the vermillion border of the lips
are u trolling me or not

 

[Deleted member 5187]

i cant tell if ur kidding or not right now LOL
View attachment 344126View attachment 344127
i measured it precisely on top of the vermillion border of the lips
are u trolling me or not

You high IQ?
Is ~1.96-1.98 okay?

 

[Vidyacoper]

You high IQ?
Is ~1.96-1.98 okay?

yes thats perfect and ideal

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

i cant tell if ur kidding or not right now LOL
View attachment 344126View attachment 344127
i measured it precisely on top of the vermillion border of the lips
are u trolling me or not

No you have to measure from where the red lips start
And to the middle of the eyebrows not below faggot

 

[Vidyacoper]

No you have to measure from where the red lips start
And to the middle of the eyebrows not below faggot

everyone on this forum measures it to the bottom of the eyebrows fucking retard

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

everyone on this forum measures it to the bottom of the eyebrows fucking retard

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

Ideal facial ratios and proportions

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+ measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper...

looksmax.org

 

[Vidyacoper]

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

Ideal facial ratios and proportions

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+ measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper...

looksmax.org

literally EVERY single user measures it to the bottom of eyebrows because its more accurate than middle - middle would change because people's eyebrows differ drastically in thickness
if theres a misunderstanding then thats fine but u dont need to instantly call me a faggot u loser

 

[Deleted member 19766]

I hate my 1.96, the worst part is that I have a narrow and short lower third with a big forehead/large neurocranium JFL

 

[AscendingHero]

View attachment 344050

Meeks FWHR is 2.0 and it looks even a bit to high

In my opinion 1.85-1.95 is ideal
1.75-1.85 is normie / okayish
Below 1.75 its over


His midface ratio is also above ideal ( 1.0-1.1) at about 1.18

View attachment 344065

what app/what are you using/how are you measuring their ratios?

 

[Jojobarret]

Doesn´t really matter if not in cartoonish proportions and if well harmonised with lower third

 

[PedroFavelinha]

cope