darkness97
Mistral
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Posts
- 2,018
- Reputation
- 2,608
GO TO FUCKING CLASS!!!!!!How do I prove mathematical axioms?
and maybe you can tell me one day
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
GO TO FUCKING CLASS!!!!!!How do I prove mathematical axioms?
he was wrong thothe laws of logic refer to the three laws of thought proposed by Plato
but the 'existent entities' dont follow a concrete pattern (which kinda defeat the whole point of these 'logical statements'), so why would i believe in such nonsensehowever that doesn’t change the fact that language is what we use to understand logical statements, and logical statements formulate the arguments that define existent entities within our reality.
exactlyHow do I prove mathematical axioms?
the definition of two changes based on whatever axiom its acting on. if 1 + 1 = 2 then 1 water drop and another 1 water drop combining should equate to 2 waterdrops, however it doesnt (but only in cases where you define 'mass') so theres some obvious flaws in 1 + 1 = 2The mass doubled, bro
That doesn't make sense, you're arguing because they can be combined into a larger whole that it therefore doesn't equal 2. The mass doubled, it didn't remain the same. 1 big slice of pizza is not equal to 1 small slice of pizza.the definition of two changes based on whatever axiom its acting on. if 1 + 1 = 2 then 1 water drop and another 1 water drop combining should equate to 2 waterdrops, however it doesnt (but only in cases where you define 'mass') so theres some obvious flaws in 1 + 1 = 2
yepyou're arguing because they can be combined into a larger whole that it therefore doesn't equal 2.
the definition of two changes based on whatever axiom its acting on
so larger mass = 2? shouldnt 2 always equal 2The mass doubled, it didn't remain the same.
In quantity but in quality "they are the same" lol no don't mix math and perception it always gives problems. Mass is a correct term but mass doesn't describe a pizza, mass = d/v. Quantity is the way how we measure all things, if we use weights, time... "A big slice of pizza is not the same as a small of pizza" yes the difference is the measure, but the pizza is: different or equal, we don't know. The meaning is not logical at all. 1ml of water is not the same as other 1ml of water. It's only the same if we consider water as H2O, which is how the molecules are conformed but the other 1ml might be more salty so we need another way to measure the saltyness and so on... Things are more complex.That doesn't make sense, you're arguing because they can be combined into a larger whole that it therefore doesn't equal 2. The mass doubled, it didn't remain the same. 1 big slice of pizza is not equal to 1 small slice of pizza.
The unknown mass of the water drop doubled when you added another water drop. The term “water drop” you’re using has undefined qualities so unless you use a new term for the sum of both water drops then you cannot call it “water drop” anymore. For example 1x + 1x ≠ 1x, instead you have to say 1x + 1x = 1y.how can one waterdrop be two waterdrops? doesnt make sense to me
exactly, 1 + 1 = 2 is an undefined quality. the definition changes completely based on whatever principles youre talking about. is 1 the atoms that make up the water drop, is it the mass that is accumulated from both, what is two waterdrops if when one waterdrop combines with another its larger whereas two seperate waterdrops would be two waterdrops?The term “water drop” you’re using has undefined qualities
Because it’s a false statement so you can’t comprehend it, it can’t exist in physical form. If water drop = x, you cannot say x + x = x in the same way you cannot say 5 + 5 = 5, you’ll need a new variable. Math is the language of the universe so a mathematical error is simply impossible to envision.exactly, 1 + 1 = 2 is an undefined quality. the definition changes completely based on whatever principles youre talking about. is 1 the atoms that make up the water drop, is it the mass that is accumulated from both, what is two waterdrops if when one waterdrop combines with another its larger whereas two seperate waterdrops would be two waterdrops?
idk i cant comprehend it
seems retarded that the so called language of the universe has errors in it, kinda defeats the entire point of itMath is the language of the universe so a mathematical error is simply impossible to envision.
That's it, anyone can defend anything with words just say I identify as a woman and retards would treat you differently.this is why higher functioning humans do not see language as anything other than a tool for manipulation. objective reality cannot be discerned through language, if anything it must be discerned in its absence, in an abstract form inside the mind. this is why you musn't even bother persuading leftshits, just kill them.
why are higher functioning humans not in power despite their ability to discern language from objective reality, if such ability existed and could be used properly then it would result in an almost perfect correlation between higher functioning people (id assume non leftist in this case) having 'power' but evidence shows otherwise.this is why higher functioning humans do not see language as anything other than a tool for manipulation. objective reality cannot be discerned through language, if anything it must be discerned in its absence, in an abstract form inside the mind. this is why you musn't even bother persuading leftshits, just kill them.