women have zero attraction to money

[manlet cUnt]

no woman has ever ovulated at the sight of a guy's bank account, duhh. the idea that women are attracted to money and wealth is a lie they tell young men to prop up their dysfunctional society. they want you buying consoomerist shit like lambos and watches and going out and earning massive bags of money because then you are contributing to the consumerist system. if young men became blackpilled and realised it's 100% looks then everyone would be neeting and rotting at home with their mothers or contributing very little taxes and the welfare leech state would collapse and all the lambo and rolex companies would go broke. no woman has ever been attracted to bezos and that's because he looks like an ugly bug-eyed faggot incel loser and no amount of wealth can conceal this. if you become wealthy your cunt wife will just fuck the pool boy or some mcdonalds wagie who she saw on tinder. the biggest slayers are literal-whos with like $1000 in the bank.
water tbh

 

[manlet cUnt]

zero again

 

[fuxkdakikez]

water

 

[qqpkp]

You're dumb, Andrew Tate is an example

 

[Nick.Harte]

Water

 

[Swarthy Knight]

Cope. Just go over to tik tok and see all the foids fawn over random MTNs with money spoiling their partners

 

[standardcel]

Cope they pick rich htn over broke Chad

 

[soover4me]

Water

 

[Pikabro]

You're dumb, Andrew Tate is an example

got girls when he was broke

 

[buflek]

this forum is too ridiculous jfl

its in their nature to be attracted to a provider, back in the days it was a hunter, now its a guy who brings the food to the table with money

 

[dimorphism]

Some people really need to hear this again tbh

 

[dimorphism]

this forum is too ridiculous jfl

its in their nature to be attracted to a provider, back in the days it was a hunter, now its a guy who brings the food to the table with money

Women only care about food. Lambos don't exist in nature

 

[Nick.Harte]

its in their nature to be attracted to a provider

From a biological perspective, yes they are because both have some benefits. They’ll mate with the poor best looking guy and cheat on him with the rich ugly provider so that her offspring can be raised in a good environment.

 

[manlet cUnt]

You're dumb, Andrew Tate is an example

andrew tate has a top percentile height and frame you tard

 

[buflek]

Women only care about food. Lambos don't exist in nature

seems like u never had female friends who get wet when a rs7 or amg shows up

(i had 2 of them)

 

[Niksy]

Cope they pick rich htn over broke Chad

false

 

[FBl]

Just show them a Birkin bag they'll literally cut open their pussy for u dick to enter comfortably

 

[buflek]

From a biological perspective, yes they are because both have some benefits. They’ll mate with the poor best looking guy and cheat on him with the rich ugly provider so that her offspring can be raised in a good environment.

well good looks are a biological sign for health, so girls would always go for the good looking rich guy. but lets be honest if there was a poor foid with a rich twin sister we would go for the rich one if both were attracted to us and had the same personality

 

[manlet cUnt]

well good looks are a biological sign for health, so girls would always go for the good looking rich guy. but lets be honest if there was a poor foid with a rich twin sister we would go for the rich one if both were attracted to us and had the same personality

who is the guy in your pfp, curlyheadjames?

 

[dreamcake1mo]

Your actually very wrong!

Women's attraction according to my observation is less about the physical beauty like it is with men, but more about preselection. This is due to differences in hormonal prepositions and the difference of nature and biological tendencies between male and female. Most men believe women think and do things according to the same view that they themselves do, and attraction is one of those things. That's why a lot of men fail in the dating market, and are additionally shocked, when they project the same values they want to see in a woman to themselves, only to find out it they are not the same.

Preselection is basically being attracted to things that imply attraction. This is why fame and money works above all forms of looksmaxxing and beauty to attract a women.

What your saying is scientifically and logically wrong. Celebrities like baby alien and other dorks in the high levels of social fraternity get more women than any unknown chad, anywhere.

I remember a quote to the effect "a woman is never more honest than when she says 'I love you' to a multi millionaire"

Your living in crazy land if you think someone like musk or bezos wont does not* have literal lines of women begging and waiting to have sex with them,... to the point of fanaticism. Why do you think view counts and other forms of rankings on social media sites were implemented? That's because it scientifically works. People, especially women, are attracted to things that imply attraction. Things other people are attracted to. When these types of people see this, they are also attracted to the person who is gaining all of that attraction. Their words hold more meaning, their faces become iconic, their actions become more significant. This is how leaders are created in todays time and you have the nerve to cope. What your saying is simply not reality. Dont be idealistic, where your comparing a good looking guy whos also mega rich and with status to the same guy whos uglier. Lets talk about reality, where the majority of slayers are subhuman and famous or with money.

 

[InnerVoid]

nah according to this forum, if you are rich women will sense it and you will drown in prime pusssy.

 

[Eternal_]

this forum is too ridiculous jfl

its in their nature to be attracted to a provider, back in the days it was a hunter, now its a guy who brings the food to the table with money

Women aren’t attracted to beta providers. Stop being retarded

 

[czwarty]

Your living in crazy land if you think someone like musk or bezos wont does not* have literal lines of women begging and waiting to have sex with them,...

you're fishing for reacts right?

if not kys, majority of billionaires have average beckys for wives (like bill gates), if they only manage to get something above that these women don't even pretend to be attracted to them, they just cheat. because what the fuck will he do, nothing. they know who's in control here

 

[klip11]

this forum is too ridiculous jfl

its in their nature to be attracted to a provider, back in the days it was a hunter, now its a guy who brings the food to the table with money

I'm going to buflek you

 

[mvp2v1]

Cope. Just go over to tik tok and see all the foids fawn over random MTNs with money spoiling their partners

they are attracted to spending money, your just the middle man. an obstacle to them...

 

[dreamcake1mo]

you're fishing for reacts right?

if not kys, majority of billionaires have average beckys for wives (like bill gates), if they only manage to get something above that these women don't even pretend to be attracted to them, they just cheat. because what the fuck will he do, nothing. they know who's in control here

I'm not fishing for reacts at all. I studied these things a while back. And everything im saying is through what i understand on this. This is why my replies end up so long.

But no.

Billionaires and famous people may have average beckys for wives because thats who they choose. Just because they went public with one girl does not mean thats the only one they can pull. This idea comes from the perspective of someone with low SMV. Do they really need to make a girlfriend or wife out of the first women who shows them interest? They simply have more access to things that would imply attraction. Your grossly misrepresenting the amount of women they have access too. Like seriously.

Women don't pretend to be attracted to a rich or famous man. In matter of fact, the reality is, it doesn't matter if you think they pretend to be 'attracted' to him. The reality of the situation that they go for them. Attractive or not, they rather go for a rich and famous man than a broke, lame attractive man. This is not my opinion, this is what actually happens and feel free to do your own study to find out this is true.

The reality of the situation is that rich and socially popular men are the only ones considered top % regardless of looks. Most celebrities who get giga women in high frequency are not good looking, or are average. Tate, rappers, pop stars, streamers. Your idea of high smv might be a girl or two saying your cute everyday, but your out of the loop about a whole different level of high smv experiences the real high % face. Women stalkers, endless DMs every 2 secs etc.

Im surprised you can say im trolling or fishing for likes when what im saying is so common sense and easily observable. Get away from the echo chamber of lookism from traumatized guys and see real statistics. This forum has a fanaticism for looks so its hard to see real data on what women are really attracted to outside of male gaze. If your broke and socially lame your not getting any women, and thats facts. At the least, your getting significantly less women than if you were otherwise rich and popular. This means those factors of financial success and social fraternity simply mean more, or at least, equal to attraction than looks itself. Preselection is the idea behind this.

 

[Ethniframementalcel]

coping hard, brother

 

[standardcel]

They want a good life including good sex

/thread

 

[Xtra]

no woman has ever ovulated at the sight of a guy's bank account, duhh. the idea that women are attracted to money and wealth is a lie they tell young men to prop up their dysfunctional society. they want you buying consoomerist shit like lambos and watches and going out and earning massive bags of money because then you are contributing to the consumerist system. if young men became blackpilled and realised it's 100% looks then everyone would be neeting and rotting at home with their mothers or contributing very little taxes and the welfare leech state would collapse and all the lambo and rolex companies would go broke. no woman has ever been attracted to bezos and that's because he looks like an ugly bug-eyed faggot incel loser and no amount of wealth can conceal this. if you become wealthy your cunt wife will just fuck the pool boy or some mcdonalds wagie who she saw on tinder. the biggest slayers are literal-whos with like $1000 in the bank.
water tbh

money matters a lot depending on the woman’s age and social class, if you want rich women you definitely need to be rich, if you are trying to date young low class girls it means nothing

 

[anthony111553]

you're fishing for reacts right?

if not kys, majority of billionaires have average beckys for wives (like bill gates), if they only manage to get something above that these women don't even pretend to be attracted to them, they just cheat. because what the fuck will he do, nothing. they know who's in control here

lmao bust most the chads we see here aren't with stacies anyway so what are you proving

 

[dreamcake1mo]

lmao bust most the chads we see here aren't with stacies anyway so what are you proving

This guy was talking straight nonsense rofl

 

[Swarthy Knight]

they are attracted to spending money, your just the middle man. an obstacle to them...

How is the supplier of the money an "obstacle" jfl you niggas have no IQ

 

[autistic_tendencies]

You’re idiot
Every oldcel who’s slaying is also rich
The slayers from my school were always the well off ones too
Looks money status duh

 

[Deleted member 30037]

OP I know what you're trying to say, you just said it poorly.

Money can buy you superficial attraction temporarily, for sure, but only looks can give you genuine desire and lust/love. There's a big, big difference.

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Cope they pick rich htn over broke Chad

When they’re old and used up ye

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

in other news, faggots aren't attracted to women

 

[the BULL]

They want a good life including good sex

/thread

The point Is that they're not attracted to you because you have Money, they're attracted to your money. If i could find a Rich ugly girl Who buxxes me i would do It, but i would still be not attracted to her.

 

[googlemoggee]

Women are usually attracted to man’s resources not just money

 

[the BULL]

Women are usually attracted to man’s resources not just money

Bro, if you had Money and left your gf at home with your assets and Money while you travel the world, She wouldn't give a shit, because she's only attracted to your assets and lifestyle and not you, many would think it's even Better like this.

 

[googlemoggee]

Bro, if you had Money and left your gf at home with your assets and Money while you travel the world, She wouldn't give a shit, because she's only attracted to your assets and lifestyle and not you, many would think it's even Better like this.

Yea I would agree LMS is what you need if you want to have a successful life/faithful women

 

[heightmaxxing]

Cope

 

[dreamcake1mo]

OP I know what you're trying to say, you just said it poorly.

Money can buy you superficial attraction temporarily, for sure, but only looks can give you genuine desire and lust/love. There's a big, big difference.

And were telling him that theres no difference between genuine desire lust/love and temporary attraction. Especially when all of the factors are superficial.

You dont think your looks are superficial? All desire is superficial as well as emotions. People grow fetishes based on things not traditionally attractive or sexual, which means the conditions behind sexual attraction are also just as subject to variables.

A matter of fact, a women not being attracted torwards a mans asthetics and more to what he provides would be even more biologically correct than being attracted to a man whos aesthetic. Because history shows our method of evolving was less about women picking beautiful men and more about the men with more resources winning with women one way or another, breeding through them.

Him saying women are not attracted to men with money is a complete lie especially considering theres factual evident and current observation that proves this wrong. Its nonsense and probably a incel bait post to invoke discussion and engagement between us.

 

[the BULL]

And were telling him that theres no difference between genuine desire lust/love or temporary attraction. Its all the same thing.

You dont think your looks are superficial? All attraction is superficial as well as emotions. People grow fetishes based on things not traditionally attractive or sexual, which means the conditions behind sexual attraction are also just as subject to variables.

Him saying women are not attracted to men with money is a complete lie especially considering theres factual evident and current observation that proves this wrong. Its nonsense and probably a incel bait post to invoke discussion and engagement between us.

Attracted to their Money not to them. If you're Rich Just go to escorts, they're less expensive.

 

[Bojack]

I just got my first paycheck I can confirm this

 

[Deleted member 30037]

And were telling him that theres no difference between genuine desire lust/love or temporary attraction. Its all the same thing.

You dont think your looks are superficial? All attraction is superficial as well as emotions. People grow fetishes based on things not traditionally attractive or sexual, which means the conditions behind sexual attraction are also just as subject to variables.

Him saying women are not attracted to men with money is a complete lie especially considering theres factual evident and current observation that proves this wrong. Its nonsense and probably a incel bait post to invoke discussion and engagement between us.

You've completely missed and disregarded the point. I literally admitted they are attracted to "money", but it's temporary and you are being used for it and the "lifestyle" it provides.

Looks on the other hand provide a biological desire to reproduce. If you think that's the same as liking someone for what they can offer you materialistically then you are highly mistaken. They are not the same in any regard.

 

[Deleted member 30037]

Attracted to their Money not to them. If you're Rich Just go to escorts, they're less expensive.

Exactly. Thanks. It's not a hard concept to grasp.

 

[the BULL]

Exactly. Thanks. It's not a hard concept to grasp.

I laugh at people Who want to make Money only so that some Gold Digger can spend them. Especially since they should be more hateful towards them since they ignored them when they had no Money, while chad got to fuck them for free in High school and college. If i had Money i would provide a luxury lifestyle for myself, and still larp as broke when dating to assure they're not After my Money.

 

[Deleted member 30037]

I laugh at people Who want to make Money only so that some Gold Digger can spend them. Especially since they should be more hateful towards them since they ignored them when they had no Money, while chad got to fuck them for free in High school and college. If i had Money i would provide a luxury lifestyle for myself, and still larp as broke when dating to assure they're not After my Money.

When Goatis explained it in a BP video it made perfect sense, it was like an epiphany for me. And now it's so stupidly obvious I can't believe I didn't recognize it on my own earlier. When I was Bluepill I use to think like them too.

 

[dreamcake1mo]

You've completely missed and disregarded the point. I literally admitted they are attracted to "money", but it's temporary and you are being used for it and the "lifestyle" it provides.

Looks on the other hand provide a biological desire to reproduce. If you think that's the same as liking someone for what they can offer you materialistically then you are highly mistaken. They are not the same in any regard.

Looks dont provide the exact same biological desire to reproduce when it comes to women!

This is male gaze, we think our biological desires apply the same to women. Look, its men who look at beautiful women and think to reproduce with them. This evolutionary correct. This is what has happened for ages since history. Women are different. This same thing and idea of asthetic is not biologically better with the majority and thus why it didnt happen back then and why it dosent happen now.

History and evolution, facts and cureent logic tells us that its resources and preselection that instinctually gives women a biological desire to reproduce. These are fucking facts. The majority of women dont look for the best looking guy. They look for the most successful. The most popular. And yes, looks are just as superficial than money. Different but equal in nature. People thinking looks as a man provide some sort of more biological instinctual nature more than than success and money are blinded by their own trauma at best and are ignoring hard cold facts.

 

[User28823]

brokie cope