women have zero attraction to money

[DrTony]

no woman has ever ovulated at the sight of a guy's bank account, duhh. the idea that women are attracted to money and wealth is a lie they tell young men to prop up their dysfunctional society. they want you buying consoomerist shit like lambos and watches and going out and earning massive bags of money because then you are contributing to the consumerist system. if young men became blackpilled and realised it's 100% looks then everyone would be neeting and rotting at home with their mothers or contributing very little taxes and the welfare leech state would collapse and all the lambo and rolex companies would go broke. no woman has ever been attracted to bezos and that's because he looks like an ugly bug-eyed faggot incel loser and no amount of wealth can conceal this. if you become wealthy your cunt wife will just fuck the pool boy or some mcdonalds wagie who she saw on tinder. the biggest slayers are literal-whos with like $1000 in the bank.
water tbh

Agreed. People may get back to you by saying women crave security (financial) but that's short-sighted. Chads back in the day also had the most resources. In today's society there is an evolutionary mismatch where old, physically weaker, balding men have acquired resources. This was never the case in our evolutionary past, where the most physically imposing/attractive/young and healthy man also used to have the best provisional ability and capacity of procuring resources (food). In face of this, women's brain is confused and you get the rise of the dualistic mating strategy. Fucking Chads in their prime, and settling with a beta provider when old and jaded OR having their backs blown out by Chads while having sugar daddies on the side (who may or may not get sex) on the side for $$.

 

[Deleted member 30037]

Looks dont provide the exact same biological desire to reproduce when it comes to women!

This is male gaze, we think our biological desires apply the same to women. Look, its men who look at beautiful women and think to reproduce with them. This evolutionary correct. This is what has happened for ages since history. Women are different. This same thing and idea of asthetic is not biologically better with the majority and thus why it didnt happen back then and why it dosent happen now.

History and evolution, facts and cureent logic tells us that its resources and preselection that instinctually gives women a biological desire to reproduce. These are fucking facts. The majority of women dont look for the best looking guy. They look for the most successful. The most popular. And yes, looks are just as superficial than money. Different but equal in nature. People thinking looks as a man provide some sort of more biological instinctual nature more than than success and money are blinded by their own trauma at best.

You're literally bluepill. Look at this guy @the BULL

Do you honestly think women don't go for looks? It's literally WATER that girls pick broke good-looking men over ugly wealthy ones. It's biology. This idea that women don't care about looks needs to end NOW because it's a fallacy.

 

[the BULL]

You're literally bluepill. Look at this guy @the BULL

Do you honestly think women don't go for looks? It's literally WATER that girls pick broke good-looking men over ugly wealthy ones. It's biology. This idea that women don't care about looks needs to end NOW because it's a fallacy.

Women go for people with Money, but only to spend their Money, there Is no attraction involved, the pussy doesn't get wet if She doesn't like his looks too, it's no different than going with an escort. While with good looks you get real sex with a wet pussy that wants to get penetrated by you and doesn't expect a monetary compensation

 

[DrTony]

Looks dont provide the exact same biological desire to reproduce when it comes to women!

This is male gaze, we think our biological desires apply the same to women. Look, its men who look at beautiful women and think to reproduce with them. This evolutionary correct. This is what has happened for ages since history. Women are different. This same thing and idea of asthetic is not biologically better with the majority and thus why it didnt happen back then and why it dosent happen now.

History and evolution, facts and cureent logic tells us that its resources and preselection that instinctually gives women a biological desire to reproduce. These are fucking facts. The majority of women dont look for the best looking guy. They look for the most successful. The most popular. And yes, looks are just as superficial than money. Different but equal in nature. People thinking looks as a man provide some sort of more biological instinctual nature more than than success and money are blinded by their own trauma at best and are ignoring hard cold facts.

You have a lot to learn kiddo. You think you have shit figured out but you actually don't. I hope you learn gradually and it is not a rude awakening. I can bet my life you are also unsuccessful with women in terms of P in V outcomes just by how you typed this small paragarph.

 

[HTN_Mentalcel]

You're literally bluepill. Look at this guy @the BULL

Do you honestly think women don't go for looks? It's literally WATER that girls pick broke good-looking men over ugly wealthy ones. It's biology. This idea that women don't care about looks needs to end NOW because it's a fallacy.

Women often want to fuck a guy because they think he is good looking. They could like the tall guy because "it makes them feel small" not because they want tall kids. All they think is " that guy is hot"

Normies are completely oblivious to genetics, a femlet and a manlet will reproduce without thinking of the consequences

 

[HTN_Mentalcel]

Women go for people with Money, but only to spend their Money, there Is no attraction involved, the pussy doesn't get wet if She doesn't like his looks too, it's no different than going with an escort. While with good looks you get real sex with a wet pussy that wants to get penetrated by you and doesn't expect a monetary compensation

I think it halos you if she is already attracted to you idk though?

 

[Deleted member 61895]

no woman has ever ovulated at the sight of a guy's bank account, duhh. the idea that women are attracted to money and wealth is a lie they tell young men to prop up their dysfunctional society. they want you buying consoomerist shit like lambos and watches and going out and earning massive bags of money because then you are contributing to the consumerist system. if young men became blackpilled and realised it's 100% looks then everyone would be neeting and rotting at home with their mothers or contributing very little taxes and the welfare leech state would collapse and all the lambo and rolex companies would go broke. no woman has ever been attracted to bezos and that's because he looks like an ugly bug-eyed faggot incel loser and no amount of wealth can conceal this. if you become wealthy your cunt wife will just fuck the pool boy or some mcdonalds wagie who she saw on tinder. the biggest slayers are literal-whos with like $1000 in the bank.
water tbh

water

 

[dreamcake1mo]

You're literally bluepill. Look at this guy @the BULL

Do you honestly think women don't go for looks? It's literally WATER that girls pick broke good-looking men over ugly wealthy ones. It's biology. This idea that women don't care about looks needs to end NOW because it's a fallacy.

No, your delusional and ignoring the truth that is so easily observable.

Its water that women would rather pick a good looking broke man because your in a echo chamber of men who fail to actually be aware of biological impulses of women. Remember the echo chamber of such people are rarely knowleagble about women in the first place. I never said women dont care about looks, i said that they care about preselection more than looks, which is why famous people smv mog any good looking person ever at anytime. Which is why bad boys get more women than good guys because of this instinctual biological preposition of good looking-good natured men not having a chance with her throughout history. My thought about money and resources just impose on this idea, as women would ultimately always pick a guy with resources especially when it comes to reproduction as its her instinctual desire to do so and has been throughout history. I wont bother to try to prove my point when history can do it for me.

Your speaking idealistic fairy tales, where perhaps in some fair world money or fame wont mean anything, and women would overcome their biological prepositions. But this is reality.

 

[HTN_Mentalcel]

No, your delusional and ignoring the truth that is so easily observable.

Its water that women would rather pick a good looking broke man because your in a echo chamber of men who fail to actually be aware of biological impulses of women. Remember the echo chamber of such people are rarely knowleagble about women in the first place. I never said women dont care about looks, i said that they care about preselection more than looks, which is why famous people smv mog any good looking person ever at anytime. Which is why bad boys get more women than good guys because of this instinctual biological preposition of good looking-good natured men not having a chance with her throughout history. My thought about money and resources just impose on this idea, as women would ultimately always pick a guy with resources especially when it comes to reproduction as its her instinctual desire to do so and has been throughout history. I wont bother to try to prove my point when history can do it for me.

Your speaking idealistic fairy tales, where perhaps in some fair world money or fame wont mean anything, and women would overcome their biological prepositions. But this is reality.

ENJOY STARFISH SEX

 

[dreamcake1mo]

You have a lot to learn kiddo. You think you have shit figured out but you actually don't. I hope you learn gradually and it is not a rude awakening. I can bet my life you are also unsuccessful with women in terms of P in V outcomes just by how you typed this small paragarph.

The crazy thing is that im not.

For reference, ive lived in one of the most highly populated places in the west, and by definition, im not an incel. Thats why i dont participate in the typical echo chamber and just post my own content. I dont look bad and ive never struggled with women desiring me,

Ive been in circles where i personally observed the differences between someone with ample resources to imply preselection vs someone who is poorer. Its a night and day difference and honestly its sad to see people who've never been in these situations cope like this. They think being cute or hot will do more to a woman than being rich. Then try to play it like one form of preselection is less superficial than the other. As if women guage attractiveness the exact same way males do, and that its some deeper biological instinct from women to desire a cuter male despite biology and history telling them otherwise. This is my definition of coping; seeing the same results yet expecting a different outcome.

You think the majority of women would not pick a billionaire over a broke 'hot' guy? And you really think her perceptions of that billionare wont change or suggest him to be better aesthetically due to his financial status, with all of his resources by one way or another giving him more preselection and through suggestion implying to her that hes simply more attractive than the hot guy? Delusional.

 

[dreamcake1mo]

ENJOY STARFISH SEX

Well, a person getting 100 counts of what you think is starfish sex a month is far better than some loser (by todays standards) getting 1 case of (what people here would think) is desirable sex after all that effort.


You guys here know nothing about women and it shows.

 

[HTN_Mentalcel]

Well, a person getting 100 counts of what you think is starfish sex a month is far better than some loser (by todays standards) getting 1 case of (what people here would think) is desirable sex after all that effort.


You guys here know nothing about women and it shows.

I think power can create genuine attraction or making money in a dark triad way like drug. I have even seen this with a manager at McDonald's fucking a Latina employee purely because he was a manager.


Status is a weird one because girls will legit hook up with doctors just to say "they fucked a doctor"

But I don't think a subhuman inheriting money means she will want to be with you.

A rich,status HTN moggs chad I agree with that

 

[DrTony]

The crazy thing is that im not.

For reference, ive lived in one of the most highly populated places in the west, and by definition, im not an incel. Thats why i dont participate in the typical echo chamber and just post my own content. I dont look bad and ive never struggled with women desiring me,

Ive been in circles where i personally observed the differences between someone with ample resources to imply preselection vs someone who is poorer. Its a night and day difference and honestly its sad to see people who've never been in these situations cope like this. They think being cute or hot will do more to a woman than being rich. Then try to play it like one form of preselection is less superficial than the other. As if women guage attractiveness the exact same way males do, and that its some deeper biological instinct from women to desire a cuter male despite biology and history telling them otherwise.

You are talking to a guy who slayed 97 women (including IG baddies) in 2 of the most hypergamous cities in US within 4 years while not making above 6 figures. Boy Bye.

 

[dreamcake1mo]

You are talking to a guy who slayed 97 women (including IG baddies) in 2 of the most hypergamous cities in US within 4 years while not making above 6 figures. Boy Bye.

Your talking to a guy who just about say the same.

Are you really boasting about 100 women over 4 years? Dude, anyone with any decent communication skills can get those figures within 5 months at any local college.

Of course, a beta will always be a beta, rich or not. Rich betas will overpay and get the least out of their point of attraction, especially if they have no experience with women and are not aware of that sociopathic nature of the people they are constantly exposed to. But your smoking crack to think money does nothing for attraction. What im saying is facts. Im not claiming that aesthetics have no bearing to attraction. Look at my other posts, my point was preselection. Money implies preselection just as much, if not greater than what looks would. This makes Ops claim pure nonsense.

I think power can create genuine attraction or making money in a dark triad way like drug. I have even seen this with a manager at McDonald's fucking a Latina employee purely because he was a manager.


Status is a weird one because girls will legit hook up with doctors just to say "they fucked a doctor"

But I don't think a subhuman inheriting money means she will want to be with you.

A rich,status HTN moggs chad I agree with that

This is what ive been trying to tell you guys.

Womens main biological instinct to true attraction is not aesthetics, its preselection. Out of money and looks, popularity mogs the shit out of those. Money makes men attractive due to what it can do to imply attraction. Obviously, a dork who does not know how to spend his money or isn't in any forms of fraternity that can utilize his economic status will end up doing pretty bad outside of paying for hookers, but he'd have to be a serious dumbass. Regardless, a broke guy with only looks would get women yea, but without resources he would be doing just as good or worst as the ugly shit who theoretically should have been getting no women if womens main point of desire was simply attraction. My main point is that OP is wrong. Money can imply attraction, and even genuine desire to the person who has money. And this point can be historically and psychologically proven to be true.

 

[Luffymaxxing]

nah according to this forum, if you are rich women will sense it and you will drown in prime pusssy.

Nah according to this forum if you self improve and become rich by 30 you'll get all that prime young hot pussy

 

[Luffymaxxing]

Use your money to improve your looks, maintain your looks and geomaxx, that's all money is good for when it comes to women

 

[DrTony]

Your talking to a guy who just about say the same.

Are you really boasting about 100 women over 4 years? Dude, anyone with any decent communication skills can get those figures within 5 months at any local college.

Of course, a beta will always be a beta, rich or not. Rich betas will overpay and get the least out of their point of attraction, especially if they have no experience with women and are not aware of that sociopathic nature of the people they are constantly exposed to. But your smoking crack to think money does nothing for attraction. What im saying is facts. Im not claiming that aesthetics have no bearing to attraction. Look at my other posts, my point was preselection. Money implies preselection just as much, if not greater than what looks would. This makes Ops claim pure nonsense.


This is what ive been trying to tell you guys.

Womens main biological instinct to true attraction is not aesthetics, its preselection. Out of money and looks, popularity mogs the shit out of those. Money makes men attractive due to what it can do to imply attraction. Obviously, a dork who does not know how to spend his money or isn't in any forms of fraternity that can utilize his economic status will end up doing pretty bad outside of paying for hookers, but he'd have to be a serious dumbass. Regardless, a broke guy with only looks would get women yea, but without resources he would be doing just as good or worst as the ugly shit who theoretically should have been getting no women if womens main point of desire was simply attraction. My main point is that OP is wrong. Money can imply attraction, and even genuine desire to the person who has money. And this point can be historically and psychologically proven to be true.

I stopped reading at your posts because you said anyone can have 100 slays in 5 months with "decent communications skills". You are an incel and now officially on my ignore list. You are also one SD below mean IQ from the pre-selection crap you vomitted on this thread.

 

[googlemoggee]

Women go for people with Money, but only to spend their Money, there Is no attraction involved, the pussy doesn't get wet if She doesn't like his looks too, it's no different than going with an escort. While with good looks you get real sex with a wet pussy that wants to get penetrated by you and doesn't expect a monetary compensation

What about neon

 

[robtical]

What about neon

 

[dreamcake1mo]

I stopped reading at your posts because you said anyone can have 100 slays in 5 months with "decent communications skills". You are an incel and now officially on my ignore list. You are also one SD below mean IQ from the pre-selection crap you vomitted on this thread.

You were already on my list.

You provided no factual evidence. Nothing supported by anything. Not history, just personal claims of what you thought was an impressive feat. Sorry bud, you thought everyone here was a loser who cant pull or never has? You tried to big bro me and clearly failed so you resort to ad hominems and other small forms of power plays that can convince yourself that you somehow 'won' the argument.

My point stands.

.

Women are more attracted to rich men - scientists | Newshub

However the same isn't true when the sexes are reversed.

www.newshub.co.nz

Experts say men need to earn THIS much to be attractive to women

NEW research has claimed that men need to earn over a certain amount of money to be more desirable to women.

www.express.co.uk

End of thread. Goodbye.

 

[Joe Rogancel]

this forum is too ridiculous jfl

its in their nature to be attracted to a provider, back in the days it was a hunter, now its a guy who brings the food to the table with money

providing genes>money

 

[standardcel]

The point Is that they're not attracted to you because you have Money, they're attracted to your money. If i could find a Rich ugly girl Who buxxes me i would do It, but i would still be not attracted to her.

Yes but if u htn with money it boosts smv girls think differently than us we are providers they are natural leeches

 

[the BULL]

Yes but if u htn with money it boosts smv girls think differently than us we are providers they are natural leeches

If you want to ltr you Need Money, it's Just Natural, can't build a family without Money, a Slayer Is a Slayer with or without Money. Most of the sex Is done in hs and college where no One has a job

 

[standardcel]

If you want to ltr you Need Money, it's Just Natural, can't build a family without Money, a Slayer Is a Slayer with or without Money. Most of the sex Is done in hs and college where no One has a job

Girls search for providers even in college my friend was driving a expensive car in college and all hoes wanted him but he also had looks

 

[Chinacurry]

Water, I am living proof

 

[the BULL]

Girls search for providers even in college my friend was driving a expensive car in college and all hoes wanted him but he also had looks

Having both Is Ideal because you're both a provider and a Slayer but Money alone doesn't create attraction anyway. My friend drives a 40k car and has 3 houses, but bitches dgaf because he's ltn. Having Money >> slaying anyway, for quality of Life.

 

[WishIwasChico]

Iq on this site is about 5 as most people’s logic here is so simplistic it is actually my funny.

Looks are everything? Yet what if I told you that 90% of men are normie and the ‘looks are everything’ only applies to the top 10 per cent in the world?

Just be too 10 per cent theory to get women omg that bro you’ve discovered a life hack!

It’s so fucking stupid to say this. Just be too 10% money, just be too 10% status or fame. Anyone who is top 10% in anything like status or money will get hot girls just as much as guys in looks will.

IN FACT, a guy who is top 10% money will keep a hot girl way more times than a hot broke guy. This is real life not a shitty looks forum.
The whole looks is everything is so funny.

Fame is everything. Money is everything. Status is everything. Be to 10% status I.e. instagram famous and not hideous? Hot women.

Be a millionaire and not hideous? Hot women.

You get the point nigga. Just look at the tinder swindler. You really think that nigga would be banging models and shit evey week if they didn’t think he was super rich? Get real. If he only relied on his looks he’d be getting ghosted by ltbs on tinder.


No wonder idiots here fail hard. They think looks are everything. They go on tinder with giga squint maxxed ‘chadlite’ pic selfies and then getting nothing meanwhile the normie guy that has status and good job and good money is ducking all those hot women while you rot.
And instead of blaming it on yourself for not working hard and achieving something in life you cry it’s because you don’t look like Lachowski. Kys op
Get real.

 

[WishIwasChico]

Iq on this site is about 5 as most people’s logic here is so simplistic it is actually my funny.

Looks are everything? Yet what if I told you that 90% of men are normie and the ‘looks are everything’ only applies to the top 10 per cent in the world?

Just be too 10 per cent theory to get women omg that bro you’ve discovered a life hack!

It’s so fucking stupid to say this. Just be too 10% money, just be too 10% status or fame. Anyone who is top 10% in anything like status or money will get hot girls just as much as guys in looks will.

IN FACT, a guy who is top 10% money will keep a hot girl way more times than a hot broke guy. This is real life not a shitty looks forum.
The whole looks is everything is so funny.

Fame is everything. Money is everything. Status is everything. Be to 10% status I.e. instagram famous and not hideous? Hot women.

Be a millionaire and not hideous? Hot women.

You get the point nigga. Just look at the tinder swindler. You really think that nigga would be banging models and shit evey week if they didn’t think he was super rich? Get real. If he only relied on his looks he’d be getting ghosted by ltbs on tinder.


No wonder idiots here fail hard. They think looks are everything. They go on tinder with giga squint maxxed ‘chadlite’ pic selfies and then getting nothing meanwhile the normie guy that has status and good job and good money is ducking all those hot women while you rot.
And instead of blaming it on yourself for not working hard and achieving something in life you cry it’s because you don’t look like Lachowski. Kys op
Get real.

Also let’s see how far this ‘just rely on looksM mentality gets you as statistically speaking 95% of guys will be normie category which means 95% of guys here are just gonna waste their whole life trying to rely on looks to fuck hot women and it will never happen.

Considering this is an incel forum though full of schizos then it makes sense tbh for these people to cope that looks is everything as they are fucked anyways

 

[the BULL]

Iq on this site is about 5 as most people’s logic here is so simplistic it is actually my funny.

Looks are everything? Yet what if I told you that 90% of men are normie and the ‘looks are everything’ only applies to the top 10 per cent in the world?

Just be too 10 per cent theory to get women omg that bro you’ve discovered a life hack!

It’s so fucking stupid to say this. Just be too 10% money, just be too 10% status or fame. Anyone who is top 10% in anything like status or money will get hot girls just as much as guys in looks will.

IN FACT, a guy who is top 10% money will keep a hot girl way more times than a hot broke guy. This is real life not a shitty looks forum.
The whole looks is everything is so funny.

Fame is everything. Money is everything. Status is everything. Be to 10% status I.e. instagram famous and not hideous? Hot women.

Be a millionaire and not hideous? Hot women.

You get the point nigga. Just look at the tinder swindler. You really think that nigga would be banging models and shit evey week if they didn’t think he was super rich? Get real. If he only relied on his looks he’d be getting ghosted by ltbs on tinder.


No wonder idiots here fail hard. They think looks are everything. They go on tinder with giga squint maxxed ‘chadlite’ pic selfies and then getting nothing meanwhile the normie guy that has status and good job and good money is ducking all those hot women while you rot.
And instead of blaming it on yourself for not working hard and achieving something in life you cry it’s because you don’t look like Lachowski. Kys op
Get real.

looks is the foundation. without looks there's no sexual attraction. but being gl doesn't necessarily mean being high PSL first, then money matters for an LTR and life quality. no one denies money is super important, in fact being rich is better than being a broke slayer. but if your goal is to have ONS, moneymaxxing as a normie won't do shit for you, women will want the resources from you and not give pussy at first date. i've had many ONS while my moneymaxxed friend who drives BMW M3 has none because of LTN face, but i'm not a good LTR candidate, because without money there is not the foundation to start a family. money doesn't create attraction, but is important to start a family and have a good quality of life.

 

[Deleted member 30037]

You have a lot to learn kiddo. You think you have shit figured out but you actually don't. I hope you learn gradually and it is not a rude awakening. I can bet my life you are also unsuccessful with women in terms of P in V outcomes just by how you typed this small paragarph.

He’s in for a ROUGH awakening when reality smacks him clean in the face. He’s probably 16.

 

[Clown Show]

You can get used as a betabuxx ofc, but there isn't a single thing that produces actual attraction chemicals and hormones in foid's brain other than looks. Nothing else was proven both scientifically and anecdotally.

 

[standardcel]

You can get used as a betabuxx ofc, but there isn't a single thing that produces actual attraction chemicals and hormones in foid's brain other than looks. Nothing else was proven both scientifically and anecdotally.

Cope money makes them feel safe. Like I said providing for a women is natural that’s why they the weak gender when they got pregnant in the prehistoric times they needed a strong men who hunted and brought them food not someone who pumped and dumped her

Ideal is both looks and money

 

[Clown Show]

Cope money makes them feel safe. Like I said providing for a women is natural that’s why they the weak gender when they got pregnant in the prehistoric times they needed a strong men who hunted and brought them food not someone who pumped and dumped her

Ideal is both looks and money

Cope.

First of all money doesn't even exist, complete modern human fantasy. How can anyone be attracted to a imaginary thing?

Second, I was talking about attraction and not about safety. You can argue that foids seek safety because they are weak and useless, but it doesn't matter who provides safety to them. Daddy government has already given them 100% safety so they don't even need men for that anymore.

The only thing that produces actual attraction is the looks.

If a foid is with unattractive betabuxx, she would want to have sex with a poor Chad. If a foid is with rich HTN, she would still want to have sex with poor Chad. If a foid is with rich Chad, she would want to have sex with middle class GigaChad. There is simply no way around it.

 

[standardcel]

Cope.

First of all money doesn't even exist, complete modern human fantasy. How can anyone be attracted to a imaginary thing?

Second, I was talking about attraction and not about safety. You can argue that foids seek safety because they are weak and useless, but it doesn't matter who provides safety to them. Daddy government has already given them 100% safety so they don't even need men for that anymore.

The only thing that produces actual attraction is the looks.

If a foid is with unattractive betabuxx, she would want to have sex with a poor Chad. If a foid is with rich HTN, she would still want to have sex with poor Chad. If a foid is with rich Chad, she would want to have sex with middle class GigaChad. There is simply no way around it.

Money is same as resources like food. Gov isn’t the same as a men on the side it’s like saying a fleshlight can replace fucking a pussy it’s not natural. If you look at model celebrities they don’t go for Opry or Chico they go for generic htn or chadlite multi millionaire actor.

 

[DrTony]

Cope money makes them feel safe. Like I said providing for a women is natural that’s why they the weak gender when they got pregnant in the prehistoric times they needed a strong men who hunted and brought them food not someone who pumped and dumped her

Ideal is both looks and money

Yes but the guy who could provide in the prehistoric time was a Chad - a physically intimidating, young (16-25) lean healthy full head of hair man. A physically capable hunter. So womens brain evolved to have preference for that archetype. Not some 30s+ skinny fat, ugly dude with receding hairline who worked hard enough to acquire wealth at a late age although he doesn’t have the raw physical genetic material (he would have perished in evolutionary past). So due to evolutionary mismatch, women will still find Chad appealing and use the older wealthy man

 

[InnerVoid]

Nah according to this forum if you self improve and become rich by 30 you'll get all that prime young hot pussy

the state of blackpilled forums in 2024