Use1ess
Iron
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2023
- Posts
- 169
- Reputation
- 155
I agree since the average guy if you are comparing the 8 billion people alive would prolly look like the guy you posted. However if you went off of that basis nearly any 20 year old would be htn as they would look better than the average 45 bloke.
Maybe instead of rating off of a chart that rates everyone it should be categorised based off of age bracket, pheno and weight since then a rating can actually have something to back its self off of.
Kinda like skill based match making in games like having people categorised and rating them off of that.
For example let’s say you are in an iron lobby (would prolly be 40 yr old curries) normally it would be impossible for them to be high rating but if you compare them to the other sample data in the iron lobby they could get a high rating just for there group.
Or another option it to cut out all 30+ year olds, subhumans and fat people since they are clearly not playing.
Maybe instead of rating off of a chart that rates everyone it should be categorised based off of age bracket, pheno and weight since then a rating can actually have something to back its self off of.
Kinda like skill based match making in games like having people categorised and rating them off of that.
For example let’s say you are in an iron lobby (would prolly be 40 yr old curries) normally it would be impossible for them to be high rating but if you compare them to the other sample data in the iron lobby they could get a high rating just for there group.
Or another option it to cut out all 30+ year olds, subhumans and fat people since they are clearly not playing.
Last edited: