Rate me and point out my flaws I am an Indian so pretty bad phenotype and genes

I mog everyone out here lmao
 
  • JFL
Reactions: impure666
Is this fkn fag jutting his jaw foward?
:lul::lul::lul::lul:
Also Op is indian which by default cannot be above 6/10
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 1106
Your chin looks really weird
 
  • +1
Reactions: kobecel
45615
yes a very bad chin
 
It never began for your curry ass
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansnob and Notorious
You look like a manlet, mouth area isnt optimal and nose looks flar
fOreVER said:
You look like a manlet, mouth area isnt optimal and nose looks flar
Click to expand...
To @Yoyome99 i am a brainlet lol
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 1560
Atlantid ngl :chad::chad:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Mansnob and Michael Myers
Curry hairstyles make me cage
 
The biggest flaw is your ethnicity. I'm really sorry.
 
mogs me
 
  • +1
Reactions: androidcel
You probably live in India based on the appearance of your room. You're completely fine bhai.
 
G O D said:
What would you rate him.
Normie rating is out of 10.
Psl is out of 8.
Click to expand...
The psl rating scale is bullshit imo.
Sorry if this is long but people need to understand. I'm replying to you but you don't have to read if you don't care at least I put it out there.

From what I've seen people rate on a psl scale based on those numbers:

6 Psl is top 5%
6.5 Psl is top 1.5%
7 psl is top 0.5%
8 Pls top 0.1%

Fine so here's the thing.

First of all who is everyone to tell the difference between psl 7 and psl 8 when it's not even a difference of 1%???? That makes no sense because how do you want to be able to determine if one person is 0.4% more attractive than someone else? Wtf? Are we even talking about millimetres of bones here or is this some nanomenter type of shit? In order to rate this accurately you'd need to compare the face, frame, weight, bodyfat percentage, race to every single blackpilled study out there, use Photoshop to compare it with the golden ratio, analyse the whole skull etc... Nobody on here is able to do so. If the difference of psl 7 and psl 8 is so little changes are higher people make mistakes and even if the mistakes are very minor it could change the whole number on all of a sudden a psl 7 gets rated and 8 while others disagree and the whole shit starts again. This is most likely the reason people on here get rated with a difference of 2psl points which is a lot.

Secondly if psl 6 is top 5% what the fuck is psl 5 or even old 4? If psl 5 is top 10% the difference between psl 6 and psl 5 is already 5% if psl 5 is top 20% the difference is already 15% which means the range gets bigger and bigger and this makes no sense at all.

Why don't we use numbers from 1-10?

1 is within bottom 10%
2 is within bottom 20%-10%
3 Is within bottom 30%-20%
Etc...

It makes way more sense, it's easier to understand and it's more accurate because theirs a range of 10% instead of 0.4 fucking percent and if you really want to be even more accurate and specific you can say 6.5 which means theirs only a possible range of 5% to the next number. You can go with 6.75 and 6.25 which leaves a range of 2.5%. It's a lot more accurate and easier.
 
impure666 said:
which type?
Click to expand...
you've already seen my face
LooksmaxxingDream said:
First of all who is everyone to tell the difference between psl 7 and psl 8 when it's not even a difference of 1%???? That makes no sense because how do you want to be able to determine if one person is 0.4% more attractive than someone else? Wtf? Are we even talking about millimetres of bones here or is this some nanomenter type of shit? In order to rate this accurately you'd need to compare the face, frame, weight, bodyfat percentage, race to every single blackpilled study out there, use Photoshop to compare it with the golden ratio, analyse the whole skull etc... Nobody on here is able to do so. If the difference of psl 7 and psl 8 is so little changes are higher people make mistakes and even if the mistakes are very minor it could change the whole number on all of a sudden a psl 7 gets rated and 8 while others disagree and the whole shit starts again. This is most likely the reason people on here get rated with a difference of 2psl points which is a lot.
Click to expand...
It's based on basic statistical theory boyo. Look up the standard distribution.
 
RedPilledStemcel said:
you've already seen my face

It's based on basic statistical theory boyo. Look up the standard distribution.
Click to expand...
i don't think i remember seeing your face. my memory is shit. most of time i just type mogs me and move onto another thread, i barely even look at the face
 
For example 6'4 and 6'5 are top 1% and top .5% respectively but it's as easy to tell teh difference between these two as it is between 5'10 and 5'11 (which are top 56% and 70% respectively)
impure666 said:
i don't think i remember seeing your face. my memory is shit. most of time i just type mogs me and move onto another thread, i barely even look at the face
Click to expand...
I do this too, just look at my rate me threads
 
LooksmaxxingDream said:
The psl rating scale is bullshit imo.
Sorry if this is long but people need to understand. I'm replying to you but you don't have to read if you don't care at least I put it out there.

From what I've seen people rate on a psl scale based on those numbers:

6 Psl is top 5%
6.5 Psl is top 1.5%
7 psl is top 0.5%
8 Pls top 0.1%

Fine so here's the thing.

First of all who is everyone to tell the difference between psl 7 and psl 8 when it's not even a difference of 1%???? That makes no sense because how do you want to be able to determine if one person is 0.4% more attractive than someone else? Wtf? Are we even talking about millimetres of bones here or is this some nanomenter type of shit? In order to rate this accurately you'd need to compare the face, frame, weight, bodyfat percentage, race to every single blackpilled study out there, use Photoshop to compare it with the golden ratio, analyse the whole skull etc... Nobody on here is able to do so. If the difference of psl 7 and psl 8 is so little changes are higher people make mistakes and even if the mistakes are very minor it could change the whole number on all of a sudden a psl 7 gets rated and 8 while others disagree and the whole shit starts again. This is most likely the reason people on here get rated with a difference of 2psl points which is a lot.

Secondly if psl 6 is top 5% what the fuck is psl 5 or even old 4? If psl 5 is top 10% the difference between psl 6 and psl 5 is already 5% if psl 5 is top 20% the difference is already 15% which means the range gets bigger and bigger and this makes no sense at all.

Why don't we use numbers from 1-10?

1 is within bottom 10%
2 is within bottom 20%-10%
3 Is within bottom 30%-20%
Etc...

It makes way more sense, it's easier to understand and it's more accurate because theirs a range of 10% instead of 0.4 fucking percent and if you really want to be even more accurate and specific you can say 6.5 which means theirs only a possible range of 5% to the next number. You can go with 6.75 and 6.25 which leaves a range of 2.5%. It's a lot more accurate and easier.
Click to expand...

As an example:

If I say @dogtown is a 9/10 facially he knows based on my rating he's within the top 10% but not at the top 1%. That makes way more sense and gives people a better understanding of your rating than saying psl 5.7564...
 
LooksmaxxingDream said:
As an example:

If I say @dogtown is a 9/10 facially he knows based on my rating he's within the top 10% but not at the top 1%. That makes way more sense and gives people a better understanding of your rating than saying psl 5.7564...
Click to expand...
No it doesn't buddy boyo, it's because 1/10 person doesn't look like chico, most people are lumped in the average so it doesn't make sense to use the 1-10 scale.
 
RedPilledStemcel said:
No it doesn't buddy boyo, it's because 1/10 person doesn't look like chico, most people are lumped in the average so it doesn't make sense to use the 1-10 scale.
Click to expand...
You know what average means? If you are average 50% of the people are more attractive than you and 50% of people are less attractive than you on AVERAGE. Average means you are in the exact middle of both extremes. Ummm which number should I use??? Maybe 5/10??? Not that far off boyo. Congrats.

I know average is a range. Therefore if you want to say someone is slightly below you give him a 4.5/10 and if someone's slightly above you give him a 5.5/10.

It's that easy. Psl scale is for low iq autists.
 
LooksmaxxingDream said:
You know what average means? If you are average 50% of the people are more attractive than you and 50% of people are less attractive than you on AVERAGE. Average means you are in the exact middle of both extremes. Ummm which number should I use??? Maybe 5/10??? Not that far off boyo. Congrats.

I know average is a range. Therefore if you want to say someone is slightly below you give him a 4.5/10 and if someone's slightly above you give him a 5.5/10.

It's that easy. Psl scale is for low iq autists.
Click to expand...
Lumped in average you retard. Did you fail math or something. Most people are in the 3-5 range. 2/3 of all people are psl 3 to psl 5
49430
pretend 0 is psl 4, -1sigma is psl 3, 1 sigma is psl 5 etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: G O D
RedPilledStemcel said:
Lumped in average you retard. Did you fail math or something. Most people are in the 3-5 range. 2/3 of all people are psl 3 to psl 5
Click to expand...
You know 2/3 isn't an accurate number when you want to say somethings average?

Definition of
Average:

Average
A calculated "central" value of a set of numbers.

Average Definition (Illustrated Mathematics Dictionary)

Illustrated definition of Average: A calculated central value of a set of numbers. To calculate it: add up all the numbers, then divide by how...
www.mathsisfun.com

What you are saying with most people are within psl 3 and psl 5 is roughly the same when others say 4.5/10 to 5.5/10 it's just easier to understand.
 
@RedPilledStemcel @LooksmaxxingDream

trucel
incel
low tier normie
normie
high tier normie
chad lite
chad
giga chad

thats how it should be
 
  • +1
Reactions: G O D
RedPilledStemcel said:
Lumped in average you retard. Did you fail math or something. Most people are in the 3-5 range. 2/3 of all people are psl 3 to psl 5
View attachment 49430 pretend 0 is psl 4, -1sigma is psl 3, 1 sigma is psl 5 etc
Click to expand...

I'll do the math for you.

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10= 55
55/10 = 5.5
So the average is 5.5

You see? Way easier to understand than saying someone is between psl 3 and psl 5?

It's the same outcome but a different scale. And 5.5/10 makes more sense than psl 3/8.
 
RedPilledStemcel said:
the psl scale is 0-8 and the average is 4
https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/standard-normal-distribution.html please read this

tbh, yeah this is probably less confusing
Click to expand...
Exactly but why use a 1-8 scale with a range of 0.4% when you can use a 1-10 scale with a range of 10% and if you really want to specify you just add a second number? If 6/10 isn't accurate enough go for 6.25/10.

Answer this:
I'm not sure if someone is psl 6 or psl 7 so I give him the number psl 6.25. What does that mean speaking of the percentage hirachy? If I say 6/10 I mean top 40-30% but what does old 6.25 psl mean speaking of percentages? If this is so easy for you in curious if you get that right now.
LooksmaxxingDream said:
Exactly but why use a 1-8 scale with a range of 0.4% when you can use a 1-10 scale with a range of 10% and if you really want to specify you just add a second number? If 6/10 isn't accurate enough go for 6.25/10.

Answer this:
I'm not sure if someone is psl 6 or psl 7 so I give him the number psl 6.25. What does that mean speaking of the percentage hirachy? If I say 6/10 I mean top 40-30% but what does old 6.25 psl mean speaking of percentages? If this is so easy for you in curious if you get that right now.
Click to expand...
Give me the exact percentage of a psl 6.25.
dogtown said:
@RedPilledStemcel @LooksmaxxingDream

trucel
incel
low tier normie
normie
high tier normie
chad lite
chad
giga chad

thats how it should be
Click to expand...
are you on the phone or computer when you are on looksmax.me?
 
Last edited:
LooksmaxxingDream said:
Exactly but why use a 1-8 scale with a range of 0.4% when you can use a 1-10 scale with a range of 10% and if you really want to specify you just add a second number? If 6/10 isn't accurate enough go for 6.25/10.
Click to expand...
??? Nigga the range isn't 0.4% fuck are you even saying. A psl 6 isn't too different from a 6.25 even if the percentile is different. The same reason we just use inches for height instead of percentile. Who cares if you are top 55% height instead of 50% height if the difference is .4 inches.
 
RedPilledStemcel said:
??? Nigga the range isn't 0.4% fuck are you even saying. A psl 6 isn't too different from a 6.25 even if the percentile is different. The same reason we just use inches for height instead of percentile. Who cares if you are top 55% height instead of 50% height if the difference is .4 inches.
Click to expand...
@dogtown and many others used to preach psl 6.5 is top 1% and psl 7 is top 0.5%. Percentile and percentage is not exactly the same. So if the range isn't 0.4% what is it then between a psl 6.5 and a psl 7?

And yeah if differences are so little a 0.25 minus or plus means a lot. So what's a 6.25psl in percentage?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

keyko
OP what are my noses flaws?
Replies
24
Views
394
Deleted member 61895
D
majesticincel
OP Finally confident enough to post myself, Rate me
2 3 4
Replies
156
Views
4K
MazoNitNit
MazoNitNit
A
Not OP [Curry Friends Pic Dump] Rate my Indian Friends
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
Deleted member 58230
D
yyamann
OP rate me (tell me what i can improve on)
Replies
46
Views
465
MonoTBB
MonoTBB
gookcel
OP need advice for my flaws
2 3 4 5
Replies
219
Views
5K
kaio
K

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 3)
Back
Top